The Spy Who Came in from the Cold (George Smiley Series)
ByJohn le Carr%C3%A9★ ★ ★ ★ ★ | |
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ | |
★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ | |
★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ | |
★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ |
Looking forThe Spy Who Came in from the Cold (George Smiley Series) in PDF?
Check out Scribid.com
Audiobook
Check out Audiobooks.com
Check out Audiobooks.com
Readers` Reviews
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
emma lindvall
My first le Carre. Loved it! Having read some of Lundlums Bourne stuff I wasn't sure what to expect. While not as action packed, this has a perfect balance of story telling and intrigue. I think what le Carre doesn't say is what makes this work so well! Definitely a new fan here!
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
joshua west
Even though many consider this one of his best, I don't agree. Five stars is warranted, however, as JLC is a phenomenal author. Characters are developed, some more complex than others, and the dialogue between them is always enticing you to keep reading.
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
sharon davis
1) Plot (4 stars) - Long time spy Alec Leamus has one final mission left before he can retire. He is to infiltrate East Germany and bring down a counter spy. But as he ventures deeper into the mission, he realizes that he has not been told everything, and there is a much bigger game being played. It was a good plot, fast moving, and I appreciated how the narrative was pushed forward by psychological mystery as opposed to James Bond-like physical action.
2) Characters (3 stars) - Leamus is the grumpy old spy who has seen too much to believe in right and wrong anymore. Liz is the idealist female interest who tries to bring him back to the world of love and morality. The antagonists are a succession of German spies--starting with the naive, to the intellectual, to finally the hardened killer. All were done well and were believable, but I didn't feel especially attached or moved by any.
3) Theme (4 stars) - The Marxists in East Germany had their Grand March of History to justify the brutality of their spy game. But what did the British have for a justifying cause? Christianity? No. Capitalism? No. Hatred of Communism? Maybe. Wanting to win at a game? Probably. It's an interesting message about Western lack of idealism. Especially considering the time it was written in.
4) Voice (4 stars) - The writing was very readable, and even poetic and socially observant at times, which was an unexpected surprise for someone who thought they were picking up a thriller. Moreover, Le Carre does something I haven't seen before--in certain sections he tells the story of the protagonist from a distant 3rd character, almost like a reporter interviewing people Leamus ran into after the fact to piece together what happened--and it work wonders for keeping the protagonist a mystery, which is what a good spy is.
5) Setting (4 stars) - The dark, overcast, sparse world of the English lower class and the worker state of East Germany were done with great detail. I definitely felt like I was there. Though, strangely, I didn't feel as frightened as I would have if this was really happening. I'm not sure if that was purposeful on le Carre's part, or shows a certain missing skill in his writing.
6) Overall (4 stars) - I didn't love it. But I liked it, and would recommend it to a certain type of person who likes Cold War history or spy novels.
2) Characters (3 stars) - Leamus is the grumpy old spy who has seen too much to believe in right and wrong anymore. Liz is the idealist female interest who tries to bring him back to the world of love and morality. The antagonists are a succession of German spies--starting with the naive, to the intellectual, to finally the hardened killer. All were done well and were believable, but I didn't feel especially attached or moved by any.
3) Theme (4 stars) - The Marxists in East Germany had their Grand March of History to justify the brutality of their spy game. But what did the British have for a justifying cause? Christianity? No. Capitalism? No. Hatred of Communism? Maybe. Wanting to win at a game? Probably. It's an interesting message about Western lack of idealism. Especially considering the time it was written in.
4) Voice (4 stars) - The writing was very readable, and even poetic and socially observant at times, which was an unexpected surprise for someone who thought they were picking up a thriller. Moreover, Le Carre does something I haven't seen before--in certain sections he tells the story of the protagonist from a distant 3rd character, almost like a reporter interviewing people Leamus ran into after the fact to piece together what happened--and it work wonders for keeping the protagonist a mystery, which is what a good spy is.
5) Setting (4 stars) - The dark, overcast, sparse world of the English lower class and the worker state of East Germany were done with great detail. I definitely felt like I was there. Though, strangely, I didn't feel as frightened as I would have if this was really happening. I'm not sure if that was purposeful on le Carre's part, or shows a certain missing skill in his writing.
6) Overall (4 stars) - I didn't love it. But I liked it, and would recommend it to a certain type of person who likes Cold War history or spy novels.
The Looking-Glass War :: A George Smiley Novel by John le Carr?? (2013-03-05) :: The Leftovers: A Novel :: Little Children: A Novel :: Successor to The Spy Who Came in from the Cold - The Looking Glass War
★ ★ ★ ★ ☆
lucy clark
I have to figure from reading other Le Carre books that it's not going to be all action packed. He's looking for the realism that he experienced in the field. But this was pretty good. A lot of twists and turns with a bleak ending but it's how it goes in the field.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
kaylynn johnsen
This book is a very neatly constructed thriller. Le Carre uses language economically and yet in a sophisticated manner. The story has relevance today as it did when written, perhaps is always the way with the work of espionage, not pleasant but necessary for the greater security of society as we have it. William Boyd's introduction, while giving away the end, was also useful in that it emphasized the need to read the book carefully, to understand the nuances of some seemingly innocent exchanges. I can understand how and why such an eminent writer as Mr Boyd said he had read the book many times. It is short but beautifully structured.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
david grchan
I thoroughly recommend this spy novel which I have reread after many years. This version has at the end a commentary by John Le Carre “fifty years later” which gives a fascinating background on the author, the novel and the divided Germany fifteen years after the war.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
susanna schick
If you read spy fiction your really should read at least of few of le Carre's books. There's a quiet brooding style he has that really puts him in the literature class, as opposed to the Bond stuff. Also, le Carre really knows his stuff. Excellent novel.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
hayley lindeman
Aside from being a socking great story, over and above a darkly edifying one, the Penguin Modern Classics edition includes an informative post script by the author in which he touches on how, and under what conditions, the story came to be written. This is useful since the world of spycraft is perplexing enough without our being left entirely to our own devices. The author's afterword also places the writing proces in the context of the author's subsequent rise as a literary giant, relating it to his own future develpment as a writer as well as to his readership's better appreciation of, not just the ideom, but the creative process itself.
Stuart Day
PARIS
Stuart Day
PARIS
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
teddy o malley
Compact, taut and evocative, with memorable characterizations and exceptional insights into the Communist mindset of the 1960s. This was Le Carre's breakout novel, and a half-century later it still ranks among his best.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
kumiko
Aside from being a socking great story, over and above a darkly edifying one, the Penguin Modern Classics edition includes an informative post script by the author in which he touches on how, and under what conditions, the story came to be written. This is useful since the world of spycraft is perplexing enough without our being left entirely to our own devices. The author's afterword also places the writing proces in the context of the author's subsequent rise as a literary giant, relating it to his own future develpment as a writer as well as to his readership's better appreciation of, not just the ideom, but the creative process itself.
Stuart Day
PARIS
Stuart Day
PARIS
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
name redacted
Compact, taut and evocative, with memorable characterizations and exceptional insights into the Communist mindset of the 1960s. This was Le Carre's breakout novel, and a half-century later it still ranks among his best.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
lesha
Fifty-something years after first reading it, I went back and read it again in preparation for Le Carre’s latest novel, which apparently revisits those events.
Superbly crafted work, which brings back indelibly the feeling of those years.
Superbly crafted work, which brings back indelibly the feeling of those years.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
jaime carter houghton
Well written, tightly focused, and elegantly plotted. "The Spy Who Came in from the Cold" sets a very high standard by which all other spy novels must be judged. The key to its appeal is that the author makes you care about protagonist Alec Leamus and his descent into what looks like an ever-tightening snare. After a standard set piece to establish the milieu, the plot unfolds slowly, with no attempt to make it into cliched "pulse-pounding thriller." The tension, therefore, is always increasing. The bad guys - if you can figure out who they are - are not caricatures but real people. And, thank goodness, the book clocks in at a succinct 225 pages (paperback). Too many novels these days are bloated and full of tedious filler, presumably to make the books look more substantial. People would buy more books if they weren't needlessly supersized! If you read just one thriller in your lifetime, make it this one.
Please RateThe Spy Who Came in from the Cold (George Smiley Series)