Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11

Excellent book! All the pieces seem to fall into place now. We all knew that 9/11 wasn't what _they_ told us it was. This is HARD scientific proof of what DID actually take place, unfortunately. I still can't find the answer as to why our government killed their own, and more importantly, how they can live with themselves. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the other "elite" globalists will have to face their maker one day. Thank God for Judy! Thank you for your tenacity and unwavering strength and courage to stand up to all the bullies during the 8 years of work you put into this invaluable piece of work! You are a lady of high integrity and I admire you! Now, to find a way to get the "truth" out to the people who need to hear it! Bless you Ms. Wood ! Perhaps you could make one more appearance on Coasttocoastam?

even if one has not yet read Dr. Wood's book and still believes that Saudis (above all) living in caves in Afghanistan with a "fearless leader" needing dialysis were responsible for 9/ll needs a teething ring-

meticulous research combined with meticulous documentation-

I have no words to describe this incredibly jaw-dropping book

Hats off to Dr. Judy Woods for laying out the true facts about what happened to the towers on 911.
To bad the Bush administration was so busy trying to destroy the evidence instead of wanting to find out the truth about what caused the towers to come down.

This book will give you such a severe reality jolt that you'll feel very giddy as the data starts to sink in, because believe me, it was all there for all of us to see, hidden in plain view, and if my experience is anything to go by, you're going to feel dumbfounded when you see that you missed the biggest piece of evidence, yeah, where did the towers go???? All the material that made up 2 x 110 stories, not forgetting all the contents of the buildings.

Cutting to the chase, what you were looking at is the result of a new weapon.

Dr. Wood has utterly convinced me: looking at the pictures after the towers came down, there's no denying it, there's um ... hardly anything left of the buildings ... and this is very important, because that's what this new weapon does ... Dr. Wood just keeps presenting the evidence, each chapter dealing with different categories of evidence, using many photographs, frames from video's shot on the day, eye-witness accounts, and processing all that information using the laws of physics, common sense and seemingly exceptional observational skills, I say that because we all missed it, right!

Even if you're one of those that never believed the official story of 9/11, I doubt you ever imagined this explanation: Directed Interference Energy, or Free Energy Technology used as a weapon to bring down the WTC buildings? No, me either ...

Whether 9/11 was a false flag or not a false flag operation, this book does not attempt to solve that question, but it certainly points the finger at the committee that brought us the official story, now those people need to be brought to justice for starters.

This new weapon brought down the WTC towers on September 11, 2001, and I have no doubt about it in my mind, neither will you once you read this book. It is a black and grim reality, but it must be understood and as citizens we must take responsibility and get the wheels in motion: justice must be done.

9/11 as an event has ushered in wars, seemingly endless wars, along with the destruction of our rights here in the USA, and as far as I can see, the complete abandonment of our US constitution, and all that, from this one event, so it's very important to find out what went on that day and who was involved.

I believe this book to be one of the most important books of the 21st century, and a very important document, as it exposes the official story to be the terrible lie that it most certainly is, and the people involved need to be brought to justice and a lot of changes need to be made in our society - that can only happen if a good many people get this book and start spreading the word.

REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS READ THIS BOOK, it is your duty to get those involved exposed and brought to justice! We as citizens can help get the ball rolling, but you have to do your job and be brave too!

I thank Dr. Wood, from the bottom of my heart, for her bravery, intelligence and desire to make us all aware of what's going on, so we can help and be part of the change for good.

This book is a treasure chest of information, packed to the brim with pictures, graphics, charts and physical formulas. Exceptional already by its size and weight, it certainly belongs into the collection of books about this event for anyone who is interested in how these events unfolded. I have never seen a better collection of pictures about 09/11, not only about the towers and their "dustification", but also about the nearby car lot, the cars with burnt-out engine blocks and door handles, but undamaged upholstery, safety belts and rubber tubings, and the site of the event, with deep holes where normally mountains of debree should have been.

Highly recommended!

The evidence is logically laid bare. Many will dismiss this as yet another conspiracy theory book. The author is a credible scientist. You may not agree with all that is presented here. If you do read it you will definitely find some of it quite compelling.

I am still reading this book, and it is shocking. I am not a scientist by any stretch, but I can get a lot out of it. Pictures are very revealing, and so are graphs. I have not read another book on the subject of what happened on 911 that is so informative, so scientifically precise and so heartbreaking.

This is work of very honest, dedicated, courageous and knowledgeable people. I would recommend buying and to reading this book for everyone who has live heart still. I pray that the truth of this tragedy will be exposed and guilty will not go free.

Read this book with an open mind and be prepared to have your beliefs flipped upside down. Forget the news. Forget the "talking heads". Forget the "official" story about Sept. 11th. Read this book and have your world view changed.

Dr judy wood,s book where did the towers go presents factual evidence of the destruction of the world trade center.It deals with What Happened and and very cleary demonstrates by way of textual and photographic analysis that something other than conventional methods is evident in the destruction.I am a lay person and have absolutely no scientific background but looking at the pictures and reading dr woods explanation I am convinced that some new energy device produced the results observed at the world trade center.Dr wood in bringing this analysis out in book form has made an awesome discovery because it deals with evidence and demonstrates very clearly that no conventional methods were evident on the day of this horrific tragedy.

All the technical nuts and bolts are there,full of insight and great pictures, but do not agree w. the coral castle theories, they push back some of the stamina of this otherwise great work by Judy Wood.
But i hold it to be very very valuable.

This book is everything it should be and more.

If you only owned one book make it this one.
It is that good.

This is one of the most important works ever
printed. I can't believe the courage this woman
has shown.

Judy Wood, thank you from the bottom of my heart
for your persistence and selflessness.

This work is a masterpiece.

Thank you for your courage and personal sacrifice in writing this incrediby valuable book. Your analysis of what the victims of 9/11 were trying to tell us as they leapt from the towers is heartwrenching but lends meaning to their suffering. Your explanation of the thermite found in the dust is also enlightening. No one else in the world had the tenacity, the intellectual curiosity, and the moral fortitude to write this book. Your analysis of the hurricane off Manhattan that day, that was actually turned back, is probably the first mention of the phenomenon on that fateful day. And yet, in the midst of what are untimately horrifying discoveries, you find purpose and hope for the future.

Because there is nothing at all anyone is going to do about it or wants to know about it in the first place. Oh they say do, but they're full of it. Yet I have seen no other possible explanation that actually gets at the core of the evidence, Dr. Judy Wood undertook the first and to this date ONLY complete scientific forensic analysis of the events that took place on September 11th 2001 available in the public domain. For years Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) wanted, NO BEGGED for a complete thorough exhaustive, meticulous analysis of the EVIDENCE. Well here it STANDS.

You will unable to see our society, national and international bodies of government in the same way. It will make your head spin because this time you know its real and there is no going back.You'll put the book away in a drawer and pretend it never existed, but you can't take pee out of the pool with a cup and you'll always be reminded or know like a permanent stain thinking "yeah we're living far below our potentials". It is by light years the most profound piece of non fiction I have ever read.

MSM will not touch real whistleblowers like Dr Judy Wood, and it is beyond UNFORGIVABLE to withhold information on the technology that was in these attacks for decades, that could be used for the betterment of humankind. What we have here is a textbook of staggering proportions, that is the equivalent of travelling back in time with laptop to prehistoric times and having the cave dwellers scatter fearing you to be some sort of deity. Except we're the dwellers. You will not see Judy Wood appearing alongside Edward Snowden or Julian Assange in documentaries, for to give her exposure is suicide for those in power. She makes Assange and Snowden look like children splashing around in a paddle pool. I believe they're let go as way as sort release valve to dupe others into believing they are freedom fighters of a sort with "their leaks", yet have they revealed that is any worth? Truly? What Dr. Wood has on her hands here would shatter every single item on the world agenda for decades to come and yet not a single word or inquiry into her work by any in the MSM. Expect that if this book were to ever get traction for Dr. Wood to end up dead along with others before her who hung onto the truth like a lion savaging her prey after chasing it single minded for far too long.

I felt I had to do something, so I started a youtube channel, promoting/sharing the sterling heroic work from IRREFUTABLE TV, in creating an abridged documentary version of what is in the book. It is woefully underseen and too important to have it buried on the Internet with only a few thousand views. I will share it and post your complied version to make sure the evidence, the truth never dies.

Thanks to Richard D Hall, Dr Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson and many others, the media wouldn't touch you because they can't, but we don't need them.

The implications are beyond staggering, the deceit unfathomable. It sounds like fantasy that would make the most hardcore fantasists laugh you out of the room and yet its unfortunately, unbearably true. Human nature is the hardest thing to change. Get out engage in your communities, spread the evidence, Stop watching trivial things on both TV and Internet. I've discovered that fiction is a hell of less horrifying and than truth. Confront. Be brave. Be intellectually honest. But don't let it consume you. Don't let this knowledge get you down, even though you will feel down or don't read it all. It may just be easier thinking that people were murdered because of the Arab world's hatred of the West (not without reason) or that some part of the USA government did (it more than likely did). But if you read you'll ask WHAT the hell did and why and why in this way?
And when will it used again and when it does will we have the presence of mind to recognise it?

Kafkaesque.

When I read the words 'directed energy' my UFO/scepticism meter went way up, and I believe UFO's to be real...
Yet a search on the Active Denial System in Wikipedia horrified and disgusted me. These are mainstream tools which were deployed to Afghanistan.
The detail and analysis are compelling, yet in 2016 it is clear that any such effort is a waste of time.
Watching JFK, I recall having an insight that it didn't matter that a coup or similar event was flawed in its execution.
It only had to generate sufficient emotion to distract and allow the execution of the purpose of the event.
Fifteen years later, it is evident that it has succeeded beyond the architects' dreams, with no end to the war in sight.
There is no mechanism for legal recourse against a government that controls the justice system.
The only such recourse is revolution, whether peaceful, as in Ghandi, or violent, as in the revolution that gave birth to America.
My own minor contribution to promoting that (peaceful, we might hope) revolution is 911 Pentagon Strike, a far simpler analysis of the security camera videos that perhaps a layman will find hard to dismiss.
I honour Dr Wood and am sorry that we live in a world where such dedicated analysis finds so little effective reward.

Did you know that 6 of 7, not 3, WTC buildings were either totally or largely destroyed on 9/11? Only WTC #5 was left largely intact (80%). See the photos! What physical process created the gapping, empty hole 60 feet deep and 24 feet in diameter carved out of Liberty Street adjacent to the WTC complex on 9/11, which the media, government and military did NOT show us? What possible energy source could have melted automobile engines, deformed chassis, and up-ended a variety vehicles several blocks from the WTC complex? How is it that the heavy, steel outer support beams of WTC's 1 and 2 could have caved in all the way out to the very tips of the light aluminum wings of the airliners which struck those buildings? Why did jumpers disrobe before jumping? Where did the thousands of metal filing cabinets contained in WTC's 1 and 2 go? Only one was recovered. You should see THAT picture! Dr. Judy Woods revelations go on and on. That's why her book has become a MUST HAVE collectors item and why it costs more today than when it was first released. That is why even over-the-top alternative media hosts like Alex Jones won't interview Dr. Judy Woods or even discuss her book, "Where Did the Towers Go?" That is why I have people lined up to borrow my copy. I still haven't finished it. The media, government and military didn't show us or even mention ANY of the photographic, documentary and scientific forensic evidence Dr. Judy Woods reveals to us in her book, "Where Did the Towers Go? We are all Truman in a Truman Show the MSM and government have subjected us to 24/7/365 for decades. ...and most of America buys all of it hook, line and sinker --- willingly. Dr. Judy Woods book is the most extraordinary book on the planet and nobody in the media, government or military will even mention its name let alone give it any light from the day. Turn off the television, get your hands on this book ( no library that receives government funding will touch it) and read it, double check the voluminous bibliography and start asking yourself, the media and your government representatives a lot of unpleasant questions.

Most people, even people that read good books, refuse to consider anything but the official story that fire and aluminum planes brought down two of the strongest buildings in the world. They won't even consider the event from a purely scientific aspect - it's just too much for them. Let them take comfort in their cozy notion that the bad guys are always on the other side.

This book presents a great deal of very compelling circumstantial, and other more concise scientific evidence that disproves the prevailing explosives collapse theory. The catch is: that Dr. Wood concludes that the various destructive phenomenon of the materials at the WTC site have never been seen before. She thinks that they're the result of a new weapon that harnesses and perfects certain theories first explored by Nikola Tesla, involving existing energy fields. The DOD has been developing direct energy weapons(DEW) for several decades, and Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers were even asked about their use in the post 9-11 war on Iraq, by an NBC reporter. They nervously evaded the question.

Needless to say, Dr. Wood's theory leaves her vulnerable to ridicule about "space beams." Well, ridicule is the mother's milk of politics and her detractors can't reasonably negate her theories with science, so they turn to political smear tactics. Even the people who tried to negate the explosives collapse theory failed. The author and editor Eric Larsen, who wrote the foreword, calls the book the most important of the 21st century, and broadly speaking, I'd have to agree.

Listen very carefully. Dr. Wood did all of the leg work of collecting evidence of the destruction of all seven WTC buildings; the terrifying deaths of the beautiful people that jumped to their deaths from WTC 1/2; the seismology data showing no bombs for demolition were used; the 'bathtub' designed to keep the Hudson river at bay from the WTC buildings remained intact; Hurricane Erin was off the NYC coast yet the media never alerted the population about the danger and it appears that Erin was involved in some yet unknown way to enhance whatever energy used to destroy the WTC buildings; Dr. Wood's legal whistle blowing suit against the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) showed three factors: protection of corporations that produce directed energy weapons; NIST's report was fraudulent and showed by omission the various psych operations used by those groups designed to confuse perceptions of citizens, (NIST did not report high heat; molten rivers of metal; nukes; thermite due to the Smith Mundt Act of 1948...yes, by '48 many already saw the gov's plan for the road of black flag psych-ops, but Mundt wanted to protect the government!) It is absolutely essential that all mentally alert Americans READ THIS BOOK.

Without a doubt, this is the best 9/11 book I have ever read! I've read a lot of the books out there, seen the documentaries and followed this subject for 15 years now. This book impressed me because right away she starts showing you the science and the math behind her theories. Not that I understood all of it, but at least she put it down on paper for people to actually look at and figure out for themselves.
I had never heard of directed free energy, I had to look it up on the internet. While I don't quite understand how it would have been used here (she doesn't do any speculating on where or how or by whom this might have been used) I believe it is another theory that has to seriously be considered. She is the only person to actually touch on some of the topics in this book that I have found. For instance, I knew nothing about the holes in some of the buildings that were left. But the sight of them was jaw-dropping! What on earth?!
I also had never seen anyone talk much in depth about the jumpers. I had a hard time sleeping at night for a long time, thinking about those poor people. What a horrible choice to have to make! But she gives an alternative to the sensitive subject. Maybe it wasn't such a conscious decision after all. The testimonials from first responders shows the shock and disbelief, the surprise they are feeling, they just can't believe this many people are actually jumping from the towers. So from that I assume that this is unusual in high rise fires. Personally I don't know what I would do in that situation but I have such an aversion to heights that I don't know if I could make myself jump. However, after watching some videos on the internet about directed energy, it does seem like people react instinctively to escape from the way it feels. Although none of the people hanging out of the windows of the towers looked like they were experiencing the level of pain that the videos lead me to believe resulted from this. Still, it is a plausible explanation that should be investigated thoroughly.
I like this book because she urges people to use their brains, to look into all of this for themselves. It's clear that she would like to open the discussion on this, which I think is what all of us would like to see. Without being called a conspiracy theorists. Like someone said, you'd have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe what the Bush administration tried to tell us happened. THAT is the biggest conspiracy I've ever heard! Read this book, it changed many of my views, opened my eyes to new things I was not aware of and is so thoroughly done that I was very impressed! Read this book! It may be one of the most important in your lifetime!

I cannot add very much more comments to the excellent comments already posted. I agree to all the high ratings this book by Doctor Judy Wood is a five star book that is beyond just another book. It is the truth hitting you in the face and challenges everything you may have thought about 9/11 in the past. It reveals evidence that is overwhelming and shocking. Once you sit down and read the facts and stare at the photos you will never be able to forget the true horror of what happened on 9/11. We can only hope that whom ever was responsible for the destruction of the twin towers is finally brought to justice. For me I can only vote for a new president and that candidate cannot be republican or democrat. I will never trust the government again. WE can only go forward and try to find other people who like this book and support Doctor Wood and her important work. We must get together and vote together to unseat the present political party and elect anew president that will start a new investigation to find the ultimate truth and bring about a government that truly believes in the constitution and the bill of rights. We need to rid our land of the corrupt and evil leaders that have chosen to sell us down the river and use us as pawns in there sadistic chess games. May we succeed in this very important task. We must try and never give up. We must never forget 9/11.

I purchased this book after debating a number of years, and I have had several friends recommend it. I never believed in the lies of 9/11 that we were fed by the media as I have an extensive aviation background, and too many thing did not add up, even from the very beginning. My quest for 9/11 truth thus started early on, and continues to this day I had seen some of the Dr Wood presentations and all she wanted to do was show that this technology exists and that conventional explosives nor the planes could not have done the damage that was done to the entire complex. Yet she discusses molecular disassociation in an understandable way... and it explains how certain things that had no explanation, is very commonplace with this directed energy technology This book has by far been one of the most compelling I have ever read, and what has made the most sense to be by far. It is difficult to put down and only took me a few days to read the entire cover to cover, despite it being a very large book.

Oh there are theories and groups out there that will tell you to stay away from Judy Wood, but I think that's because they would like to keep the masses are far away from the truth as possible. Most of the folks who spend time criticizing Judy, have not even taken a serious account of her work. No one is going to give you the information you seek.. you have to look for it yourself. I would definitely say to purchase this book
while you can, if you ask me. Those buildings did not collapse. they were completely demolished in a very efficient manner. Imagine the collateral damage if the buildings actually did just topple. A quarter of a mile times two can go a long way, and don't forget building 7. Please consider this publication if you are seriously interested in knowing the truth about 9/11. Scientific but understandable.. Good read.

I am delighted to finally see Dr. Judy Wood's book about the disintegration of New York's World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, appear in print. It has been a long time coming but well worth the wait.

Based in large part on her website and on the research she's been doing for over eight years, "Where Did the Towers Go?" is an exhaustive study of what happened to those two, quarter mile high, 110-storey skyscrapers on that horrible day and how they literally disappeared to dust. A structural engineering firm involved in building the Trade Center estimated there should have been almost 1.2 million tons of rubble. But, because we see mostly dust and unburned paper on the ground and a minimum of debris in the basements, Dr. Wood asks, "Where did it all go?"

With over 500 excellent color photographs, many charts and graphs, and solid calculations from an expert in mechanical and materials engineering, Professor Wood challenges the official story of 9/11 with compelling evidence that cannot be denied. Her study should convince anyone still skeptical of any alternative explanation as to what happened to the Towers that day that the generally accepted media and government explanation is utter nonsense.

Step by step, Dr. Wood takes us for an in-depth look at what really happened. She suggests that we have been brainwashed from the very beginning moments of the tragedy into believing the story we were being told on television. She shows us that we did not see what we thought we saw. In fact, she shows us clearly that we have been carefully deceived.

Dr. Wood starts by examining the free-fall speed at which the buildings began to plummet, but also graphically explains that very little of the huge structures actually ended up hitting the ground. In fact, the seismic data and the very limited ground penetration and destruction proves an overwhelming amount of material of the Towers was quickly turned to a very fine dust that spread both horizontally outward and vertically upward to form large plumes that finally settled on the streets of lower Manhattan and out into the rivers. One by one, Wood dismisses the official explanation as well as some of the alternate explanations from various 9/11 truth movements.

For me, the lack of a debris pile is the most convincing evidence that the Towers did not topple but were disintegrated on the spot in about 10 seconds each. It does not appear to be action of pulverization but more of what Dr. Wood calls "dustification".

She invents new and clever terms to describe what we saw that day and now see in the recorded photos. She does this in order to erase any pre-conceived ideas of what happened, telling us that the human mind always looks for answers by relating what it experiences to events it has observed before and to what is familiar to it. When the brain sees something totally new, it attempts to explain the phenomenon using what is in its memory. For this particular event, we must guard against that tendency, and descriptions using a new vocabulary help us do that. We begin to see what we thought we saw and what we were told to believe we saw in a different way. Only then can we begin to glimpse the truth of what took place.

Addressed in the book are many unpleasant subjects that most of us do not want to remember. We start to see the people who jumped to their deaths from a new angle. We see vertical circular holes in adjacent World Trade Center buildings that we were never shown before. We see cars blocks away that were "toasted" or flipped over. We see large steel beams and columns bent, twisted, thinned and rusted in peculiar ways that heat cannot cause. We see weird fires and fuming dirt on the ground for blocks...fuming that continues for months. We see WTC Building 7 completely destroyed after 5 pm that afternoon, never having been shown to be hit by an airplane. We see steel turned to "jelly", metal peeled, fusion of dissimilar materials, strange rounded holes in glass, and thinning and extremely rapid aging of materials in just a matter of hours. And, we read the recorded and documented testimony of dozens of first responders such as firefighters and emergency rescue workers that the debris from two 500,000+ ton Towers was almost non-existent.

Dr. Wood goes on in the latter chapters of the book to acquaint us with something she calls the "Tesla-Hutchison Effect" and its similarities to what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. She makes a good case for the use of a directed energy weapon based on that method. It involves setting up what's called a field effect by the interference of different types of energies concentrated on a particular target. There really is nothing new here: genius inventor Nikola Tesla demonstrated such effect a hundred years ago.

As with Judy Wood, I, too, thought it was very strange that the Towers "came down" on 9/11, but I couldn't put my finger on what could have really caused their demise. Now, with the release of this groundbreaking volume of work I am beginning to see the truth. I am beginning to see what I did not see before or what I was not permitted to see because of the power of immediate and incessant suggestion by the media and the government.

I highly recommend purchasing and reading "Where Did the Towers Go?" if you dare to get a glimpse of what really happened on a day that shaped the current history of our world for at least the first decade of the 21st century.

My background. When the planes downed the twin towers, my first doubts I had about the matter was when Bush gave an explanation for the terrorists actions. He said they hated our freedom and way of life. I'm thinking, no way that can't be a reason for their attack. As time went I read of those who questioned that the planes could down the towers, and heard how their jobs were threatened for them speaking out. Hmmm, that really got me questioning things. Then I was so delighted when I learned about AE for 911 truth. Finally! A large number of experts saying it had to be controlled demolition. Later on a friend of a friend told me about Judy Wood and her claim that an energy weapon brought down the buildings. That alone made Judy sound like a nut case to me. Still, I think, why would someone come up with such a nutty idea. Then I have to think of how my friends treat me when I say that the towers did not come down by the planes, but by controlled demolition. They think I am a nut case. So, I thought lets see what I can find out about Judy on youtube. I watch a couple videos and though she is not polished at giving interviews, her information was outstanding, so much that I did buy the book. Read the book and I'm astonished how she seems the exact opposite of a nut case. I'm very impressed with her detailed analysis of the subject. I watched a lot of the news when 9/11 happened, but the news definitely didn't give any of the detail that Judy Wood provides in her book. Her book is excellent and well worth the time to read.

If it was the burning jet fuel that took down the Twin Towers, then why didn't it burn up the planes in the sky before they hit said Towers? The TV says jet fuel melted 3" thick I-beams....but somehow the planes were able to burn this same fuel in their engines?!? Just think about it...you should figure it out if you're IQ is above 32.

I am delighted to finally see Dr. Judy Wood's book about the disintegration of New York's World Trade Center Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, appear in print. It has been a long time coming but well worth the wait.

Based in large part on her website and on the research she's been doing for over eight years, "Where Did the Towers Go?" is an exhaustive study of what happened to those two, quarter mile high, 110-storey skyscrapers on that horrible day and how they literally disappeared to dust. A structural engineering firm involved in building the Trade Center estimated there should have been almost 1.2 million tons of rubble. But, because we see mostly dust and unburned paper on the ground and a minimum of debris in the basements, Dr. Wood asks, "Where did it all go?"

With over 500 excellent color photographs, many charts and graphs, and solid calculations from an expert in mechanical and materials engineering, Professor Wood challenges the official story of 9/11 with compelling evidence that cannot be denied. Her study should convince anyone still skeptical of any alternative explanation as to what happened to the Towers that day that the generally accepted media and government explanation is utter nonsense.

Step by step, Dr. Wood takes us for an in-depth look at what really happened. She suggests that we have been brainwashed from the very beginning moments of the tragedy into believing the story we were being told on television. She shows us that we did not see what we thought we saw. In fact, she shows us clearly that we have been carefully deceived.

Dr. Wood starts by examining the free-fall speed at which the buildings began to plummet, but also graphically explains that very little of the huge structures actually ended up hitting the ground. In fact, the seismic data and the very limited ground penetration and destruction proves an overwhelming amount of material of the Towers was quickly turned to a very fine dust that spread both horizontally outward and vertically upward to form large plumes that finally settled on the streets of lower Manhattan and out into the rivers. One by one, Wood dismisses the official explanation as well as some of the alternate explanations from various 9/11 truth movements.

For me, the lack of a debris pile is the most convincing evidence that the Towers did not topple but were disintegrated on the spot in about 10 seconds each. It does not appear to be action of pulverization but more of what Dr. Wood calls "dustification".

She invents new and clever terms to describe what we saw that day and now see in the recorded photos. She does this in order to erase any pre-conceived ideas of what happened, telling us that the human mind always looks for answers by relating what it experiences to events it has observed before and to what is familiar to it. When the brain sees something totally new, it attempts to explain the phenomenon using what is in its memory. For this particular event, we must guard against that tendency, and descriptions using a new vocabulary help us do that. We begin to see what we thought we saw and what we were told to believe we saw in a different way. Only then can we begin to glimpse the truth of what took place.

Addressed in the book are many unpleasant subjects that most of us do not want to remember. We start to see the people who jumped to their deaths from a new angle. We see vertical circular holes in adjacent World Trade Center buildings that we were never shown before. We see cars blocks away that were "toasted" or flipped over. We see large steel beams and columns bent, twisted, thinned and rusted in peculiar ways that heat cannot cause. We see weird fires and fuming dirt on the ground for blocks...fuming that continues for months. We see WTC Building 7 completely destroyed after 5 pm that afternoon, never having been shown to be hit by an airplane. We see steel turned to "jelly", metal peeled, fusion of dissimilar materials, strange rounded holes in glass, and thinning and extremely rapid aging of materials in just a matter of hours. And, we read the recorded and documented testimony of dozens of first responders such as firefighters and emergency rescue workers that the debris from two 500,000+ ton Towers was almost non-existent.

Dr. Wood goes on in the latter chapters of the book to acquaint us with something she calls the "Tesla-Hutchison Effect" and its similarities to what happened in Manhattan on 9/11. She makes a good case for the use of a directed energy weapon based on that method. It involves setting up what's called a field effect by the interference of different types of energies concentrated on a particular target. There really is nothing new here: genius inventor Nikola Tesla demonstrated such effect a hundred years ago.

As with Judy Wood, I, too, thought it was very strange that the Towers "came down" on 9/11, but I couldn't put my finger on what could have really caused their demise. Now, with the release of this groundbreaking volume of work I am beginning to see the truth. I am beginning to see what I did not see before or what I was not permitted to see because of the power of immediate and incessant suggestion by the media and the government.

I highly recommend purchasing and reading "Where Did the Towers Go?" if you dare to get a glimpse of what really happened on a day that shaped the current history of our world for at least the first decade of the 21st century.

Where Did the Towers Go? settles the longstanding dispute over what happened in NYC on 9/11, and not enough can be said about the tireless forensic work performed by Judy Wood to get us to this point.

While the ultimate impact of this book is as uncertain as the impact of any truth-telling in our times, it is interesting already how much the existence of WDTTG? changes the "rules of engagement" between those who have looked carefully at the 9/11 evidence, and those who have not.

Up until now, those who have been familiar with 9/11 anomalies (largely through Judy's work) have been in the unenviable position of having to translate a massive amount of data into sound-bite fragments to get our points across to others. Judy's website, as remarkable as it is, has never been a user-friendly reference for people who are new to the subject of 9/11 forensic research, a limitation that has left the burden of translation largely in our hands.

But now, with so much of the compelling 9/11 evidence contained within this one book, we are finally unburdened of the need to repackage Judy's work for dissemination; already I have handed two copies of WDTTG? off to friends, and the reactions have been IMMEDIATE.

WDTTG? is a forensic study, pure and simple. That means that anyone with an interest in 9/11 (and who is not in that category?) is a part of the potential readership for this book. My advice is, buy as many copies of this book as you can afford, and spread them as far and wide as possible...

An interesting background read on 9/11 for some of the technical analysis but Wood steps well away from scientific facts in drawing her conclusions. If you are interested in the subject then go for "Solving 9/11" by Christopher Bollyn. It is by far the best book on the subject ever written. He not only covers the scientific evidence that proves the buildings were not bought down by the planes alone, but also reveals how the buildings were bought down and why. It is a must read.

Dr.Judy Wood's dynamite expose of the 911 myth. Must reading for the enlightened and those with an open mind to the possibility, maybe probability that FED.GOV's. explanation of this mass-murder of American citizens is erroneous and fraught with error.She makes a scientific case for sophisticated implementation and delivery of explosive systems that likely did damage and put asunder the foolish assertion that a rag-tag bunch Jihadists with nil experience to fly a commuter jet airplane, yet several could pull off this diabolical plot. Is there complicity here? Dr. Woods bent was not to frame that question and rather leave it to others. However her in depth investigation leads one to that conclusion.

Americans were told lies on 911 and they were told what to see and who did it. Total lies by a complicit media? Dr Wood deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for her work. Leaving no stone unturned, Dr Wood proves by evidence alone, a directed energy weapon caused the WTC buildings to turn to dust and no conventional weapons or demolition could have been used. Conversely, the physics behind this this type of weaponry has a practical application. That is, the energy source is unlimited, can eliminate the need for fossil fuels and power everything. This is the news of the century but most folks are asleep. Dr Wood's book should be required reading for all students, government decision makers, and and for all in the intelligence community because this is a game changing piece of history. If you have friends who are open to read this, let them know.

Field effects like, buildings disappear faster than free fall (violates the law of physics), coordinated spikes in magnetometer readings round the world as each tower disappears, no significant seismic footprint equal to building mass, cars two blocks away flipped upside down (but undamaged) and others with strange 'burn' patterns.

This book is a very comprehensive forensic analysis of what happened to the World Trade Center Buildings on September 11, 2001. Using her education, knowledge, and experience Dr. Judy Wood does a detailed and accurate review of the evidence.

Step by step she examines the facts; what she presents in this book is not a theory and it isn't speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened.

She pretty much has had to forfeit her life as a successful scientist, and become a pariah, because her presentation and explanation of the facts goes against the 'status quo' impossible Official Version! In fact she is the only individual who has filed laws suits against the falsehood. This book is brilliant and presented in a no nonsense easily understood manner. She presents complex science in a straight forward manner.

This book is a must read for anyone with a discerning mind who has had problem believing the Official Spin.

The idea that the WTC were intentionally destroyed will naturally be hard for average people to fathom, but by inserting nonsense and baseless claims into the mix, the perpetrators, and those wishing to cover-up the crime, can easily turn most everyone away in disgust.

Much of Judy Wood's main work occurred in the mid-200s, so those coming to the 9/11 movement today, may be unaware of the large body of scientific work that already easily refutes her claims, even as it supports the idea that 9/11 was an intentional false flag attack. Many felt Wood's work should not be dignified with serious responses, however, those at the Journal of 9/11 Studies made a sincere effort and their articles are listed below.

In a nutshell - Wood's claims are nonsense. Yes, the evidence of the destruction of the WTC Towers suggests that the 9/11 attack was the work of insiders ( high-level officials in the US government and military, not "the government", but likely compartmentalized insiders), and yes, the evidence supports intentional destruction (I recommend the website 9-11 Research by Jim Hoffman and the papers at the Journal of 9/11 Studies for full information), but you don't need weapons from space, as is shown by the many papers at the Journal and published elsewhere.

Judy Wood functions as Morgan Reynold did in the mid-2000s. Morgan Reynolds was a former Bush Admin official when he made the claims that the planes on 9/11 were "cartoons", not real planes (imagine our surprise). On the day before the 5th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Dr. Morgan Reynolds explained to a FOX News audience of millions:

"There are no big Boeing crashes . . . at all four events . . . what you will see is a fake, cartoon display . . ."

This is what I'm talking about. And this is whom Judy Wood paired up with to make her similarly ridiculous claims.

So much has already been written debunking the claims of Judy Wood that there is little more that can be added. Physicist Greg Jenkins, of dc911truth.org, did the 9/11 community a service when he videotaped a conversation he had with Judy Wood following a presentation she gave in Washington. Her apparent inability to understand basic concepts of physics which Jenkins attempted to discuss with her exposed the essential flawed basis for her claims, not just about energy weapons from space being involved in the WTC attacks, but even about her understanding of the events of 9/11 themselves.

Even Wood's early analysis of the Towers' destruction was inherently flawed, as promptly pointed out on discussion forums, and clearly refuted by Greg Jenkins in the Journal of 9/11 Studies:

"In an attempt to analyze the collapse times of the WTC towers (what she calls the "billiard ball" analysis), the conservation of momentum and energy are flagrantly violated. She assumes that with each collision, all momentum in the problem is obliterated. Her underlying assumptions are left unstated and the reader is left to ponder this egregious violation of physical law."
A Brief Analysis of Dr. Judy Wood's Request for Correction to NIST: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
by Dr. Greg Jenkins & Arabesque

Later, Wood teamed up with Reynolds to attempt to criticize Dr. Steven Jones in papers. However, the overt inclusion of ad hominem attacks exposed the papers as primarily hit pieces rather than scientific papers.

Relevant Papers:

INTERVIEW WITH DR. JUDY WOOD AND DR. GREG JENKINS
Analysis by Greg Jenkins and Arabesque; May 15, 2007; Journal of 9/11 Studies

A study of some issues raised in a paper by Wood & Reynolds
Dr. Frank Legge; January 11, 2007; Journal of 9/11 Studies

The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center
Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins; Journal of 9/11 Studies

Was a "star-wars" beam weapon used at the WTC? Scientific Critique of Judy Wood's Paper "The Star Wars Beam Weapon"
James Gourley; January 9, 2007; Journal of 9/11 Studies

Why the damage to WTC Bldgs. 3 and 6 does not support the beam weapon hypothesis and some correspondence with Dr. James Fetzer about it.
Tony Szamboti; Updated March 20, 2007; Journal of 9/11 Studies

Introduction to and Interview with Dr. Judy Wood conducted at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. regarding the use of Directed Energy Beams in the Demolition of the World Trade Center Towers; February 9, 2007
Greg Jenkins; Journal of 9/11 Studies

9/11 Family Members and Scholars: Request for Correction Submitted to NIST
Bob McIlvaine, Bill Doyle, Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Richard Gage, Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice; Journal of 9/11 Studies

[...].

Dr. Judy Wood WINS! This woman of iron-clad intellect has unraveled the mystery of the iron unraveling! Dr. Judy Wood, a most qualified guide, balances the scientific reality of 9/11 with the sensitivity of her oceanic heart. Both head and heart are wed in this work of painstaking genius. With a background in Applied Physics, Interferometry, and Materials Engineering Science, Dr. Judy Wood seems to have been born specifically for this historic World Trade Center investigation. What many of us have only guessed at--"Isn't that debris pile too small?!"--the brilliant Dr. Wood proves beyond a shadow of doubt: The Twin Towers never hit the ground!

In her elegant 500-page text book, Dr. Judy Wood guides us through all anomalous phenomena of the WTC complex, focusing solely on "what happened" that morning, in a careful consideration of all observable physical/photographic evidence--after effects including seismic signals, magnetometer readings, unto the virtually unknown Category 3 hurricane off the eastern seaboard that very morning. She shows us the direct correlation of this startling evidence as it mirrors The Hutchison Effect--energy-field effects born out of the early 20th century scientist Nikola Tesla's experiments and inventions--discoveries of a free-energy, not kinetic, activated via interferometry: the interference of various beams, energy fields, or electromagnetic waves. Dr. Wood resurrects to his rightful place Nikola Tesla, the true father of alternating current, wireless communication, and the rotating magnetic field. Though Dr. Wood does not name the exact device responsible as the mechanism of destruction on 9/11, she expertly delineates "the extraordinary effects that can result from electromagnetic interference."

The attractive text is beautiful to look upon--high quality photos, graphs, and easy-to-understand language. A unique accompanying bookmark helps us keep our own bearings, serving not only as a map of the WTC complex; I daresay, the bookmark reminds me of a "prayer card" given at memorial services, in honor of the dead. But of course, it is the Towers themselves that are being memorialized herein.

It isn't every day that tears roll down one's cheeks while studying a science text book. In this case, the tears are a two-fold intermixture: Firstly, there are tears triggered by sorrow for the loss of life, perpetrated through a crime of monumental proportions, via a sinister new weapon; and secondly, tears of absolute wonder and delight are shed for definite evidence of a revolutionary new free-energy technology, destined to positively change and improve the lives of every soul born on this planet for ages to come--and not just change mankind a little but revolutionize the progressive evolution of each and every individual.

We might also shed a tear for Dr. Judy Wood herself--she who lost her job as a result of pursuing 9/11 research; she who has been severely maligned by several "good ol' boys clubs" expert in disinformation and deception; she who had a student and friend murdered within the course of research; and she, who has met with mammoth resistance in the publication of this first groundbreaking tome. Dr. Wood is of an entirely different caliber--an intrepid soul, full of zest, purity of thought, and a sacred perseverance--possessing qualities few exercise today, but for which she will be remembered always.

Dr. Judy Wood makes demands of us, her readers and students: Keep looking. Keep asking. Look again! "Listen to the [actual] evidence. ALL of it." She begs us to awaken our own childlike sense of wonder and to have greater courage. Dr. Judy Wood does not let us turn away from stark reality. "Where Did the Towers Go?" will indeed strike a fearsome awe in your heart for its fascinating yet terrible truths. It is, at once, a solid scientific treatise and a memorial to those who perished; it is also a grateful acknowledgement of those who have continued suffering and losing their lives up to this very day.

9/11 was not our country's purportedly historic watershed moment: Dr. Wood respectfully educates us to the really-ignored game-changer, scientist and inventor, Nikola Tesla. In tracing 9/11 after-effects back to their true cause, Dr. Wood ingeniously shines the spotlight on Canadian researcher John Hutchison and his own Tesla-like experiments; and in so doing, the sleight-of-hand that has become the "official story" of 9/11 is brought into sharp relief.

The world will owe Dr. Judy Wood a great debt for her efforts, and I cannot thank her enough. Dr. Wood aptly quotes Mahatma Gandhi within her text: "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." I predict many will "see" for the first time under Dr. Judy Wood's loving care.

[...].

It took me 10 years to take closer look at 9/11, never really thought of it as suspicious. Bumped into some vids on youtube of the buildings 'falling', and realized this was impossible.I felt so naive that I hadnt noticed any of this sooner. Never mind where the planes were, and when, what cave Osama was in, what Cheney said, Bushes expressions, what temp fuel burns at,none of this matters till one can explain the way these buildings 'dropped'. Especially building 7. Why is this so hard to understand? As Dr Wood points out, and is the process of a true scientist, look at the evidence first, the totality of it,Do the WHAT happened before the 'who',the 'why' and so forth. Not the other way around.
For example,I at first thought the name of the book was odd, not realizing how massive these buildings were. In photos immediately after there destruction, I repeatedly saw the lack of debris. So, before I ask things like 'was Cheney here or there at at 8:43 or 8:48', I have to know where the hell the towers went! This was no ordinary event, free fall speed, lack of rubble, oddly toasted cars quite far from the site, people 'jumping' from windows as never before witnessed by fireman, aluminum wings slicing through steel girders like butter, on and on the anomalies go. Most of us know it was an 'inside job', we just dont know how to prove just 'how' inside. This book shows, with hard evidence, carefully laid out, that this crime was something nearly beyond our comprehension. But the evidence she so meticulously presents is so overwhelming, that you will feel about every emotion at the end of the book-anger, relief, liberation, anxiety, 'un'duped, excitement, mostly,you will feel very well informed!!

I would bet that the people who 1-star'd this extremely well researched 500+ page book, never read it.

There is so much here that you must read it for yourself. That said, what sold me the most -- other than the almost complete powdering of concrete and steel -- was the toasted cars (the very strange burning and disintegration of vehicles and their parts that were blocks away from the actual site). Dr. Wood's explanation is the only one I have come across to explain this extremely strange phenomena.

I would like to add that the people who appreciate this book are likely true skeptics.

A true skeptic (look up skeptic): questions everything and takes nothing on faith, even from cherished established institutions, such as the government and mainstream media.
Asks questions to try to understand new things and are open to learning about them.
Applies critical examination and inquiry to all sides, including their own.
Seeks the truth and considers it the highest aim.
Thinks in terms of possibilities rather than in preserving fixed views.
All of which is what Dr. Judy Wood does here.

Those who gave this well-thought-out and researched book a single star, are likely those who live in the black and white world of a pseudo-skeptics.

A pseudo-skeptic does not question anything from established institutions, but takes whatever they say on faith and demands that others do the same.
They apply "critical thinking" only to that which opposes the status quo, and immediately judges as false and debunks anything that contradicts their paradigm.
They have no interested in truth, evidence or facts, only in defending their own safe and warm views.

All that said. It is extremely painful to seriously entertain the fact that individuals we trust within a high place of government, have done this to us and all America. You just want to vomit.
But do we stick our heads in the sand...as so many have done. Or, put truth first?

It is almost as entertaining to read the reviews as it was to read the book, but only after reading the 9/11 official report.
Any educated scientific literate adult, can compare the two publications and come away with a common theme.
The 9/11 report blames the lack of debris on "friction" and
Dr Judy woods work, seems to indicate that friction is not even
a relevant factor. Adding up the "phenomena" that 9/11 created
one comes away thinking several different thoughts.
We may never know how the buildings came down.
We can know but not prove the existence of the energy weapons.
The official version is flawed, relies on a lack of evidence
fails to even acknowledge the "phenomena" and creates a new
previously unknown "effect" to explain the dustification of
concrete, even while leaving us completely flustered on the
steel. LOL LOL LOL The Pentagon is an even worse lie, the
governments actions post 9/11 are the biggest indication of
a conspiracy even more damning than the hard evidence, which
was all carted away within hours of the event.
Coverup is a dead giveaway that something is awry. So many
of the facts in this book go completely un answered by mainstream
media and government, that it leaves a glaring hole in our
fabric of sanity. 110 stories disappeared but they did not burn
nor collect on the ground? why deny that? just because you cannot
explain its implications? That is completely insane. We have
to go where the evidence leads. All the bad reviews of Dr Woods
work, they all start with a predjudiced against conspiracy and
a blind faith in not looking or following the evidence in favor
of a cognitive dissonance acceptable conclusion that has to be
formulated "prior to the analysis of the actual evidence" and reading the bad reviews they all have this one feature. Just because I cant say what caused the buildings to come down, does not mean the governments version of events is correct or even
logical, and it definitely does not make the governments case
valid. If the 9/11 report was a scientific review of Dr Woods
evidence, we could all have a conversation, but since the 9/11
report does not even investigate the science, LOL it does not
even recognize the most obvious things about 9/11 that just don't
add up, all that burning ash, yet not one tree was scorched LOL
globs of glowing goo that doesn't catch even paper on fire?
engine blocks dissolved from 2 miles away? even thermite cant
approach an adequate explanation of that one, maybe thermite
can answer some of the points, but not all and therefore thermite
alone cannot be the answer. This is in the face of 90% of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists that believe the thermite explanation.
Im sorry but its inadequate, of all the explanations of how
steel and concrete can dissolve in midair, jet fuel burning the
office furniture is the least scientifically literate suggestion
of all 3, DEW Thermite or kerosene burning office furniture,
now analyze the 3 and come back, watch the videos and come back
then comment that you see no scientific reason why burning office
furniture could "not" be responsible for dissolving a building
and we will know your mentally retarded, socially stunted,
completely brainwashed, or a paid government misinformation operative which since Snowdens revelations, are apparently on every corner watching every American and listening, reading your life work as well!!! Dr Woods does not come close to solving
the mystery, but she completely dissolves the governments official explanation. Once you get to that point, it wont take long to start filling in the blanks on your own. Speculation
is rampant because the government is giving us another single gun theory ala Warren Report fame, and together, they do make
us all out like the idiots that still cling to government
myths like Roswell was a tin foil balloon. Selective dissonance
from feeble minds. Throw out all your subjectivity, and
follow the hard evidence, you wont solve this mystery but you
will completely and totally invalidate the governments conclusions and the implications of their coverup misinformation
and disappearing evidence/debris all adds up to something you
will need to investigate even further. Once you watch the pentagon video and realize they cut out the frames and wont put them back, the ones that would show what hit the pentagon? why?
how ridiculous if you hid the film its as damning as the Zapruder film which was hidden for over a decade from us.
9/11 pilots for truth and their turning over of the witnesses
and getting them to admit they were forced to participate in
the illusion is another damning source of hard evidence and they can be contacted at their dot com and the fact is the black boxes gave away the altitudes and so many government errors were made trying to cover up the truth about the pentagon, that they
made huge mistakes and that adds to the unacceptability of the
twin towers explanation. You want to know why American's are still brainwashed even to this day to ignore or reject anyone
or any evidence that upsets their cognitive dissonance for 9/11,
read the book about the HAARP and the GWEN ext low frequency
waves and what they can do to the human mind collective and in mass, and then start asking yourself, start watching the videos
of the twin towers dissolving long before material hit the ground
it vaporized even steel sections that were never close to the
burning fires, And any welder can tell you that steel turns
to moulten goo and blobs down due to gravity, it doesn't turn
into dust, that's not physically possible, have you used a cutting torch? or are we to believe your opinion is valid
in complete rejection of know simple scientific possibilities?
Think about it, the building gets hot the metal turns to globs
of goo, not into dust, ask any welder you know. And to suggest
the entire building went the dust route concurrently simultaneously in harmony LOL LOL all at the exact same time
denying the engineering and construction facts that make
that additionally impossible.
Just because I cant prove a duck walked by, the duck prints
the recording of the quack, the duck droppings all add up to
evidence that I can scientifically use to determine the
conclusion. But, I cant prove it LOL LOL LOL just like santa clause jesus muhammmmmmmad you know. They have more followers
than DR Judy Wood yet, something tells me that "where did the towers go" is more non fictional, than santa claus etc.
So who is really the insane cultist?

The massive wtc towers were rugged symbols of american power and yet somehow turned into a dust tsunami in lower manhattan on 911. The 1\4 mile high steel girded monsters were reduced to a tiny pile of rubble in seconds. I wish this horror movie was not real but it actually happened and it is scary to think that man is in possesion of a God like power that did this. Whether it was a controlled nuke blast or directed energy i do not know but like the atom bomb in the words of Brahma via oppenheimer " i have become death, the destroyer of worlds". God does not misuse His infinite power, only man does. It is truly horrifying to think that innocent people were being microwaved and forced out of windows by a energy field and raining down on wtc streets. The heat was incredible within a mile of wtc according to the first responders. Anyways i bought this book from judys site and the only complaint i have is that it was printed in china. 3000 toilets in the wtc and not one was recovered, amazing. Whoever is responsible for this nightmare will stand before God someday and the fed govt will have no power to cover this up for them.

Dr. Judy Wood received her B.S. in Civil Engineering (specifically Structural Engineering), M.S. in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), and PhD. in Materials Engineering Science (an interdisciplinary degree consisting of Material Properties and Engineering Mechanics), with her specific area of expertise being in Image Analysis and Optical Methods, all of which she brings to bear in this textbook forensic presentation of the evidence, along with a very sharp mind and an uncompromising commitment to the truth.

She goes about her investigative task in a very meticulous and critical fashion, relying entirely on available evidence from a multitude of sources: still photographs, video recordings, audio recordings, eyewitness testimony, seismic data, and satellite imagery. This is by far the most comprehensive analysis of the physical details regarding the events of September 11, 2001 in New York City I've yet encountered in any medium.

As a layman, the evidence I find most compelling are the "toasted" cars. Hundreds of toasted cars were found for many blocks around the World Trade Center. No one in the 911 "truth" movement seems willing to discuss this enormous anomaly. Why? The photographs and videos of this fact are all there, available for anyone to look at and study the details of. In fact there are even television newscast reports of this bizarre occurrence. Yet few if any of the heroes in the 911 "truth" movement dare say a word about this important detail. Are they in search of the truth, or something else?

When I think of all the ad hominem character assassinations perpetrated upon Judy Wood by various members of the so called truth movement, I'm reminded of a quote by the Renaissance Humanist Michel de Montaigne:

"If falsehood, like truth, had but one face, we would be more on equal terms. For we would consider the contrary of what the liar said to be certain. But the opposite of truth has a hundred thousand faces and an infinite field."

This is literally the single most evidence-packed book regarding 9/11 to be published since it happened. It is neither based on theory nor speculation; rather, it is simply based on easily-verifiable well-referenced physical evidence, analysis and discussion of that evidence, and the inescapable conclusions that are drawn from that evidence. This book is a must-read for any person who wishes to understand the true implications of the 9/11 attacks, and why there has been such an obvious, extensive, and relentless attempt to confuse people and divert our attention away from this overwhelming sum of important evidence. The truth has been out for a long time thanks to the selfless efforts of Dr. Judy Wood and the online database she has compiled at drjudywood.com, and now it has taken a new form. THANK YOU SO MUCH Dr. Wood!

Dear Dr. Wood,

Thank you so much for your relentless bravery and your selfless efforts to help others understand what really happened on 9/11. The overwhelming database you have compiled is overwhelmingly conclusive and has left no doubts in my mind about what truly happened on that terrible day. Thank you so much for everything you have done for our special planet, and for strengthening my faith in the human species. Together, we can bring out the truth and end this corruption once and for all.

Best wishes,

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M2 Medical Student
B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

This book does not address any WHO or WHY questions.
This book simply asks, WHAT happened on September 11, 2001?
Dr. Wood argues that neither the official story nor theories of so-called 9/11 Truthers such as controlled demolition, thermite, etc can explain what we saw on that day.

Before reading this book I, finding the official story hard to believe, had been persuaded that some sort of controlled demolition took down the Twin Towers. Now I believe this theory to also be implausible. In my estimation this is the definitive book on the subject, raising questions that must be addressed before going any further.

Have you ever had doubts about the official accounting of the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/01? Have you followed the many players, developments and theories within the 911 Truth Movement and wondered just where the truth really is? In Where Did the Towers Go, Dr. Judy Wood expertly presents real answers that may surprise and disturb you.

In her long awaited book, Dr. Wood methodically deconstructs both the official story and popular alternative theories about the physical demise of the buildings. Using basic principles of physics and engineering, she clearly demonstrates why the mainstream and alternative versions could not have happened as presented.

Dr. Wood recognized early on that new, unbiased words had to be used to accurately describe the unusual phenomena that were observed on 9/11. For example, she introduces us to the term, "Dustification", and explains the how it is uniquely different from "Vaporization" or "Pulverization". Using a combination of witness testimony, observed phenomena and materials analysis, she goes on to offer compelling evidence of the use of a new kind of weapons technology on 9/11/01: Directed Energy. This is not a who-dunnit. Dr. Wood eschews finger pointing in favor of the primary task of scientifically assessing the evidence to determine what happened and how.

The hardcover book itself is substantial and well designed, generously filled with exceptionally clear multi-color charts and tables as well as crisp color plates, glossary and footnotes. Anyone who has ever purchased a highly valued reference book will immediately recognize the $39.95 price as a bargain and the information contained in the book, priceless. It is available at Dr. Wood's website.

I borrowed a stack of books from the library about 9/11, the factual information in those combined equaled about 1% of what is in Where Did The Towers Go? Where Did The Tower's Go? is a one of a kind reference for investigating the destruction seen at the World Trade Center site. Everything is referenced so you can begin your own intensive research and more importantly this book has NO THEORIES, it is a collection of evidence. The Evidence can easily rule out any kinetic means of destruction.

EXCELLENT! I got my forty dollars worth in Judy's Introduction ALONE, and I'm only on page 23 of the book!

DO NOT listen to the negative reviews, imbeciles prattling on (or worse, moles of the perpetrators trying to dissuade an angry public from finding the truth). You better believe that if they will lie using those who have sacrificed any integrity that they may have had, such as at Popular Mechanics, that the perps would write bogus reviews here at the store's site. Google "popular mechanics 9/11 propaganda" as a start.

Prove her wrong! A billiard ball would drop the 110 stories in about 9.22 seconds. The twin towers fell in roughly 10 seconds each. Near free-fall speed. Each floor was about 12 feet apart. Place your hands as close together as you want and clap them together 110 times in 10 seconds. Can't be done! Now imagine 110 stories of support beams and concrete slapping together (each 12 feet apart), 110 times in 10 seconds. Each of the 110 floors pancaking in perfect symmetrical collapse down on the next. All in 10 seconds! Pancaking indeed! And the fire was localized to only a few floors each, meaning the fires certainly DID NOT weaken the structures 80 floors, or so, underneath where the planes struck, even if you errantly believed Avgas fires were capable of weakening the structural steel enough to cause catastrophic failure. What a load of drivel the American public has been sold!

Buy the book that in the Intro alone proves box-cutter wielding foreigners did NOT surgically destroy one block of buildings in downtown New York City on 9/11. Care to buy this book, Larry Silverstein?

Against enemies foreign and domestic. If domestic enemies did not perpetrate 9/11, then enemies DOMESTIC are certainly covering up what really happened on that day. Why?

Can you say "False Flag Operation"?

How many innocents were murdered that day? And by WHO?

We're going to need some more rope.

Where Did The Towers Go? by Dr. Judy Wood provides the answer: The twin towers and the other buildings of the World Trade Center were turned into dust. You saw that with your own eyes, didn't you? Dr. Judy makes her case and points to a currently secret technology which will revolutionize energy supply and open a bright future for everyone. Too bad the people who destroyed the World Trade Center would deny that future to mankind. This important book is currently unavailable, but you can visit her website to get a preview. Write to Dr. Judy Wood. Encourage her to release her book and continue her work.

I've read many of these reviews and the opinions of people commenting who clearly haven't read the book and their comments are no more viable than a person born blind telling us about the color blue or green. For those of you want to get an idea of what Dr. Wood is talking about.... go to [...]

Forward to minute 1:05. The army guy deatils the machine in question sends high radio frequency waves that burn at about 425 degrees. All you need to do is extrapolate from there. This technology exists. Why couldn't a device exist that's 5x as large that burns at 3000 degrees? As they say in the video it takes time to heat up....which answers many of the questions Dr. Wood posed in her book. It's not exactly the same as she describes but it's a similar concept..penetrating into an object to heat it up. Which would have a completely different affect than demolition explosives or nukes on a structure.

Probably the most compelling piece of evidence for me, as a professional engineer, is that Dr. Judy Wood has produced the only report/narrative that encompasses all of the data. None of the other narratives are congruent with all of the data. Many people have put forth theories that fit some of the data points, however Dr. Wood's book "Where Did the Towers Go?" encompasses all of the data and unifies these data into single report/narrative. This one piece of evidence alone should be enough for every breathing and conscious person on the planet to take Dr. Wood's report for what is and that is an accurate and complete representation of the facts and evidence.

People can use other narratives, but all those other narratives contain deficiencies or elements that have to be ignored because of the inconsistencies or the narrative must be modified in some way to accommodate these data somehow. This is not he case with Dr. Wood's work.

Further, much of the information can be verified through the pictures provided in the book. There are hundreds of photos and simple diagrams that show conditions that other narratives have not been able to explain and that are consistent with Dr. Wood's evidence.

911 twin towers exercise was a controlled demolition - it's obvious. However, this is the best collection of still photographs on the tower destruction. To witness the demolition you have to view the slow motion collapse of the towers.

Frightening read as the author shares that not even a pool ball could have fallen so far so fast as the towers did, and they had material inside them. Provides information using photos, graphs/charts, and interviews. Insightful and unnerving.

This is one of the best books that I have read in years. I hold a BS in Chemistry and a minor in math. I am very familiar with the scientific method. Dr. Judy Wood does a great job of applying the scientific method to the destruction of the twin towers. The book is a must read for anyone serious about science and the truth.

In order to better understand the mechanism of destruction, I highly suggest a book by Dr. Paul Laviolette, Phd, Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion: Tesla, UFOs, and Classified Aerospace Technology.

For those, like me, who disbelieve the government fairy tale, who are confused by the disinformation and lies propagated by the media and on the internet and who, like me are dissatisfied with the 911 (Whitewash) Commission Report, then look no further than Where Did the Towers Go? By Dr, Judy Wood.

I am a lawyer, but my undergraduate degree was in chemistry so I have a scientific background and can understand many technical areas. Many people are not scientists, but don't be put off by this book. Although the book was compiled out of lectures and studies, it is written in an easy to read format that is easily understood and is not overly technical. The book contains hundreds of stunning photos and information that I did not even know existed. Some of the questions/aspects featured in the book: Hurricane Erin, "toasted" cars that were nowhere near the World Trade Center Towers that fell and could not have been damaged by any debris, weirdly shaped and glowing pieces of metal (called "cheetos"); "dustification", weird fires, and unexplained reams of paper that did not burn, people being blown out of buildings and more.

Dr. Wood posits a new and unproved scientific thesis. While she has had more than her share of critics and has paid dearly for expounding upon her scientific analysis of the evidence (she not only lost her job, but has been hounded by her detractors who seek to "debunk" her theories, not with facts, logic and scientific study of their own, but with childish personal attacks and amateurish efforts that fall far short of their mission.

Sherlock Holmes, the fictional detective created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, had his detective follow the scientific method that is best summed up in this quote - find a theory that takes into account all of the facts and "whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."

Dr. Wood has done just that. My husband ordered the book by Dr. Wood. When it arrived, I could not put it down. Since that time we have distributed many copies to friends and family. I would wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone.

I'm still wrapping my head around the information in Dr Judys book. It's amazing how many people don't want to "know" what happened on 9-11. Just accept the fact that "terriorist" did it and move on. Dr Judys book is telling the world WHAT happened on 9-11. Part two of the book should be to follow the money to find out the WHO and WHY. Thank you Dr Judy

I can't say enough about how thorough this book is in examining the evidence left behind at ground zero in New York City on 9/11/01, and in the days and months after this tragic event, known as the greatest crime committed on US soil. Judy Wood brings understanding of the anomalies of the destruction left behind with vivid photographs and her explanations of them. She has an amazing way of looking at the evidence and using her observation skills. I've been a part of the 9/11 Truth movement for 6 years and I met Judy for the first time on the fifth anniversary of 9/11 in front of the White House demanding a real investigation of 9/11. Judy Wood is the only 9/11 Truth researcher that has filed a Qui Tam Law Suit in the US Courts challenging the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)conclusions of the destruction of the Twin Towers which she documents very well on her website [...]. I totally agree with Judy Wood when she states this in her summary at the end of her amazing book, "This book is not about naming a known technology. This book is about observing the evidence of what happened and understanding what happened." If you have to get your car fixed you go to a mechanic. If you want to understand the destruction at ground zero in New York City on 9/11/01 go to a fully educated material science person, a person named Dr. Judy Wood.

*Where Did The Towers Go?* by Dr. Judy Wood raises the level of advocacy for 9/11 Truth quite a few notches. This research is about what our senses tell us when we look at the crime scenes at Ground Zero. The detractors who still believe the government myths about what happened that day may or not be able to sit still long enough to follow Dr. Wood's compassionate narrative. But if they do, there is a good chance that even they will start to wonder about what they are seeing. Because not all of us can sift through tens of thousands of pages of eye witness testimony, reports, videos, and tens and thousands of pictures, we need researchers with the right expertise to do this--Dr. Wood and other engineers and architects and investigators have been doing this for a decade--let's get behind their efforts and demand a new investigation. Dr. Wood's ability to raise the questions that need to be asked can be understood by every reader and her detailed research can be respected by every honest, scientific mind. Consensus Reality is shifting to supporting the effort to justly convict the mobsters who committed one of the most horrific acts in the history of nation building. Also see Senator Mike Gravel's new Citizen Initiative to get the real investigation going asap....[...]

9-11 was a seminal event. Read all the information about it and form your own opinion, but remember that it is the strong tendency of human nature to try to fit what is observed with our senses into a coherent and comfortable conclusion. But we have here as described in detail by Dr. Wood an event the details of which DO NOT fit the known paradigm. Blame whomever you want as a cause of the events but look very carefully at the evidence she has collected. It is scary and marks a turning point in world politics.

While I am only through the first 5 chapters, I cannot put it down. This book is by far the first (and probably the only) legitimate work worth reading regarding the tragic events of 9-11. Dr. Wood's thorough research speaks for itself. The evidence put forth to the reader is well organized and very clear. Everything makes sense. As we move through life's journey we are faced with choices where truth is concerned. Finding truth is both a blessing and a curse, as we realize that things are not always the way that we have been lead to believe by our corporate owned 'alphabet soup' news media. Once the eyes are opened, we can begin to move forward towards real answers to real questions instead of lies and cover ups. Character attacks and slanderous remarks against the author only distract others away from the truth.

Congratulations Dr. Judy Wood, It has been a Year since I bought your book! I thank you for all your work, and effort, your book shows with utmost clarity, that the so called official story does not hold any weight. A picture is worth a thousand words and your book has untold number of pictures that pose thousands of questions! I don't have the writing ability to give justice to your work, but I hope with all my heart, that your book, with all that it implies, will help to bring those, that are responsible to justice! Thank you!

Where Did The Towers Go? - the only legitimate investigation into what happened to the WTC complex on September 11, 2001.

Many who were dissatisfied with the official story including the findings of the 9/11 Commission Report were shrewdly misdirected away from looking at authentic evidence by duplicitous elements within the 9/11 truth movement. These 'elements' were in part successful because they manipulated their access to useful contacts and wide ranges of the media for the spin and desired herding effect. This has only allowed them to play for time, but now an increasing number of conscientious and disillusioned people have begun to awaken to the false promises of those repeatedly calling for a new investigation.

Today there is no need to call for a new investigation because thanks to the authenticity and expertise of Dr Judy Wood, this book in its entirety is THE investigation into what happened!

Ideally, it is recommended that for anyone intending to read "Where Did The Towers Go?" with the respect it deserves, it is best viewed from an educational standpoint and not that associated with those interested in conspiracy theories. The content of this book will not satisfy the fantastical minds of a conspiracy theorist because instead of evidence and irrefutable scientific facts this sort of person is driven by the endless possibility of alternate theories mixed-up with half-thruths; this is in part why the distractors have been(up to now) successful.

Before you delve into the book's five hundred pages, please read the brief note inside the hard cover by Dr Wood...here's a clue - she mentions 'courage'.

Thank you for even caring enough about what happened on 9/11 to read this review.

Like many, I'd already educated myself to the mainstream media (MSM) lie that purveys every aspect of human life before 9/11. Therefore, my first reaction to what I saw and heard was not who did this but why, what was this setting the scene for to follow? However, despite my ability to see any MSM events that we're programmed to see for what they are? I too still `fell' for the SysOps and attuned my reasons for ` How' it was done by looking at the Plane and controlled demolition suggestions that we were told about within minutes of events. Cue the WWW forums trying to prove impossible lies and devouring themselves from within.

What this book and Dr Judy Woods talks have achieved, is to take the deliberate planting of erroneous and just plain impossible theories (mostly coming from the very so called 9/11Truth movements) and shows us very clearly with her scientific reasoning why her conclusions are fact. They explain what we all saw on that day when the towers fell down and on their journey simply turned into dust. She doesn't have to tell us what device did this or how it works, that for those in Global Corporate Companies, Government contractors, the governments of the world and the Global Military industrial complex who committed these and all the other crimes against the people of earth.

If you read this book and don't agree with the science, logic and facts, then I'd suggest you've got a lot of de-programming and re-educating to do and you're in for some very difficult self-realisations of who you are and what you think you know about your role here on earth?

Read the book, return to the events leading up to that day and the world that followed, then ask yourself `Why is the World the Way it is?'

This book is based on primary evidence - a forensic study of 9/11. It has been a real battle to bring to fruition - for so many reasons.

Dr Wood has made a considerable sacrifice - and others have worked hard to support the effort to bring this information to the world. This book will cast down a number of challenging sets of evidence and it has certainly lead me to some difficult to accept conclusions. Please help to raise awareness of the book itself, and the evidence it contains.

Please see [...]

One day ,while on the internet, I saw an interview with Dr. Judy Wood about her book on 9/11. She was discussing all the weird events that happened, that I simply had an knowledge of. After this interview, I knew she was on to something, and I was compelled to buy her book. From the very weird car fires, stories of levitation, chunks of building that just "dustify" as they fall, you name it. Just take a close look at the picture on the front cover of her book, everything looks wrong, because it is wrong! She points it all out for you. Something very weird, and very evil happened on 9/11. She knew it, and is exposing it. Thank you Dr. Judy Wood.

Made the 9/11 comission look like they met to play bingo every night. Should make all other 9/11 truthers feel like they wear tin foil hats and play in the dirt in front of grandma's house. Made me feel good about buying the book and real bad about what what type of power is in the hands of bad people. It unveiled huge pieces of evidence that both sides choose ignore because they have no way of formulating a conclusive hypothesis. She does this with amazing results.

Judy Wood was on mt internet radio show "Tim Gatto Uncensored and Uncut". She explained in detail how they disintegrated the Twin Towers. Forget about nano-thermite and explosives, that's all misinformation to lead people away from what really happened. I read the book twice and I believe she has described the crime scene (That's what it was) in detail. They carted away the evidence as fast as they could. There was one picture in the book that really got my attention. They showed a pay loader with a glowing red steel beam that it was carting. If that beam was hot enough to glow red, it would have melted the cables that carried the hydrolic fluid. She said that even though it was glowing red, it wasn't hot. Cars were seared and engines melted but paper next to the cars weren't burned. Directed energy will do that. Read the book, it will open your eyes.

This review is from: Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11 (Hardcover)

I was a reluctant believer in the controlled demolition hype....... Had nothing else to base my opinion on, so I accepted Dr. Jones and Mr. Gages's diatribe. Not until listening to an interview of Dr. Judy Wood, (Phd Engineering and subspecialty in interferometry) on the November '09 on the Veritasshow.com website by Mel Fabregas were my eys opened to what I saw that day. Clearly the word 'Dustification' coined by Dr. Wood describes what one sees when you look at the cover of "Where Did The Towers Go?". Another word that could be used to describe this is "Frothing".

The book, systematically walks the reader through all the anomalies of this event including "The Jumpers". Dr. Wood treats this heart wrenching aspect with great sensitivity and humanness. Dr.Wood has tried to place herself in the situation of the folks that had to endure this experience. She in fact has committed this research to give closure and answers to those that needlessly lost their lives.

This book is a beautifully prepared, 500 page scientific Treatise documenting this historic event. A text book for future generations to examine. Regrettably, this event was an opportunity by "The Powers That Be" to alter the world as we knew it. This book does not deal with the 'Who Dun it' but rather in 'What Dun it' ......... by dispelling all the disinformation theories as 'Mini Nukes', 'Thermate', 'Nano Thermate 'Two Aerplanes Hitting Tower #1 and #2', and Tower #7 collapsing by its self several hours later from isolated fires. All this done with vertually only two stories of rubble left to be hauled away.

So the Title of the book, as very apt. Where Did The Towers Go? ............. Mostly into dust !!!!!!

Dr. Judy Wood wins! This woman of iron-clad intellect has unraveled the mystery of the iron unraveling! Dr. Judy Wood, a most qualified guide, balances the scientific reality of 9/11 with the sensitivity of her oceanic heart. Both head and heart are wed in this work of painstaking genius. With a background in Applied Physics, Interferometry, and Materials Engineering Science, Dr. Judy Wood seems to have been born specifically for this historic World Trade Center investigation. What many of us have only guessed at--"Isn't that debris pile too small?!"--the brilliant Dr. Wood proves beyond a shadow of doubt: The Twin Towers never hit the ground!

In her elegant 500-page text book, Dr. Judy Wood guides us through all anomalous phenomena of the WTC complex, focusing solely on "what happened" that morning, in a careful consideration of all observable physical/photographic evidence--after effects including seismic signals, magnetometer readings, unto the virtually unknown Category 3 hurricane off the eastern seaboard that very morning. She shows us the direct correlation of this startling evidence as it mirrors The Hutchison Effect--energy-field effects born out of the early 20th century scientist Nikola Tesla's experiments and inventions--discoveries of a free-energy, not kinetic, activated via interferometry: the interference of various beams, energy fields, or electromagnetic waves. Dr. Wood resurrects to his rightful place Nikola Tesla, the true father of alternating current, wireless communication, and the rotating magnetic field. Though Dr. Wood does not name the exact device responsible as the mechanism of destruction on 9/11, she expertly delineates "the extraordinary effects that can result from electromagnetic interference."

The attractive text is beautiful to look upon--high quality photos, graphs, and easy-to-understand language. A unique accompanying bookmark helps us keep our own bearings, serving not only as a map of the WTC complex; I daresay, the bookmark reminds me of a "prayer card" given at memorial services, in honor of the dead. But of course, it is the Towers themselves that are being memorialized herein.

It isn't every day that tears roll down one's cheeks while studying a science text book. In this case, the tears are a two-fold intermixture: Firstly, there are tears triggered by sorrow for the loss of life, perpetrated through a crime of monumental proportions, via a sinister new weapon; and secondly, tears of absolute wonder and delight are shed for definite evidence of a revolutionary new free-energy technology, destined to positively change and improve the lives of every soul born on this planet for ages to come--and not just change mankind a little but revolutionize the progressive evolution of each and every individual.

We might also shed a tear for Dr. Judy Wood herself--she who lost her job as a result of pursuing 9/11 research; she who has been severely maligned by several "good ol' boys clubs" expert in disinformation and deception; she who had a student and friend murdered within the course of research; and she, who has met with mammoth resistance in the publication of this first groundbreaking tome. Dr. Wood is of an entirely different caliber--an intrepid soul, full of zest, purity of thought, and a sacred perseverance--possessing qualities few exercise today, but for which she will be remembered always. Dr. Judy Wood makes demands of us, her readers and students: Keep looking. Keep asking. Look again! She begs us to awaken our own childlike sense of wonder and to have greater courage. Dr. Judy Wood does not let us turn away from stark reality. "Where Did the Towers Go?" will indeed strike a fearsome awe in your heart for its fascinating yet terrible truths. It is, at once, a solid scientific treatise and a memorial to those who perished; it is also a grateful acknowledgement of those who have continued suffering and losing their lives up to this very day.

9/11 was not our country's purportedly historic watershed moment: Dr. Wood respectfully educates us to the really-ignored game-changer, scientist and inventor, Nikola Tesla. In tracing 9/11 after-effects back to their true cause, Dr. Wood ingeniously shines the spotlight on Canadian researcher John Hutchison and his own Tesla-like experiments; and in so doing, the sleight-of-hand that has become the "official story" of 9/11 is brought into sharp relief.

The world will owe Dr. Judy Wood a great debt for her efforts, and I cannot thank her enough. Dr. Wood aptly quotes Mahatma Gandhi within her text: "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." I predict many will "see" for the first time, under Dr. Judy Wood's loving care.

The world owes a huge debt of gratitude to Judy Wood. Working virtually alone in her field, though assisted by a small but dedicated group of researchers, she has over the past five years assembled an impressive dossier of evidence, much of it reproduced in this book. That evidence leads her to the inescapable conclusion that the destruction of the World Trade Center on 11 September, 2001 was brought about by the militarized use of a force so powerful, so devastating, that it has been kept a tightly wrapped secret ever since.

Her evidence is primarily photographic. Dr Wood has always held to her view that you should look first at what the evidence tells you. Only then, when all possibilities have been sifted can you begin to find a pattern that will lead to the truth. It is her refusal to accept the easy option, her stubborn determination to think 'outside the box' that results in her often startling and disturbing conclusions. It seems to me that there is an almost intuitive element to this process which is not in any sense opposed to logical deduction. On the contrary, it frees the mind and makes possible the leaps of imagination of an Archimedes or a Newton.

For those conversant with Wood's website, some of the pictures will be familiar and some completely new. In no other book have so many images of the debris and destruction been collated. Seeing them laid out on the page, in high quality colour, they seem oddly to gain in authoritativeness. In addition, there are many detailed tables and diagrams. The text is concise and pointed. Dr Wood's own commentary is interspersed with numerous eye-witness accounts from firefighters, first responders and scientists on the spot, whose testimony is often strikingly different from the orthodox story. For me the most difficult chapter was the one dealing with the 'Jumpers'. Wood's analysis of this most painful of topics offers no comfort or easy answers.

I have to admit that there are places where the science leaves me far behind. Wood's speciality is interferometry, a discipline that gives her a particular insight into the behaviour and interaction of wave forms. Few can boast instant familiarity with all the terms used in the text. Other topics, however, such as the extraordinary presence of a major hurricane off the coast from New York City on the morning of 9/11, a fact which was ignored by the media at the time and has never become part of the official story, are not at all hard to grasp. Similarly, the bizarre photos of twisted, deformed metals from the highly unorthodox laboratory of John Hutchison are clearly directly comparable with some of the strangest images from 9/11. Despite doubts over his credibility from many critics, no-one has explained how this eccentric loner achieves these truly amazing results. There is clearly something going on here which defies conventional scientific analysis.

Whether or not the key to the mysteries of 9/11, above all the sheer unreality of the way the towers were destroyed, is contained in these contorted beams and fused ''meteorites' of metal and unburnt paper, the fact remains that these are questions only Dr Wood has dared to ask. The craven and shameful abuse to which she has been subjected by her fellow 'Truthers' has in no way deterred this brave woman from pursing her lonely path to truth and, eventually, to justice for the thousands who died on that day and in the wars that followed.

Andrew Lowe-Watson

I think what's needed here is someone to play the "Devil's Advocate." Ideally, this should be neither a supporter nor a detractor, since cheer leading and debunking both interfere with objectivity. Rather, this task should fall to someone who is in general agreement with the proposals put forth by Dr Judy Wood in "Where Did The Towers Go?" yet retains a degree of skepticism. I would like to offer myself to fill the role of "Devil's Advocate." I started out with a great deal of skepticism, even though I had navigated Dr Wood's website rather extensively before even buying her book; but during my reading of the book that skepticism gradually gave way to more of an editorial critique of the material's organization and presentation than a critique of the material itself. This is not to say I have no reservations about Dr Wood's thesis, only that any reservations I might have fall short of dissuading me from her thesis. At first I was going to title this review "All Dressed Up With Nowhere To Go" because of the dearth of information regarding Free-Energy Directed Weaponry. I would advise even Dr Wood's staunchest supporters not to minimize that lack as it may very well prove to be her "Achilles Heel."

Dr Wood makes it perfectly clear from the outset that her sole aim is to identify what happened to the twin towers on 9/11/01 - not to speculate on what specific type of entity was responsible for the myriad anomalies she presents. However, she goes well beyond her original intent when she dismisses, step by step, every other kind of entity that has been put forward as the cause of the collapses; by doing this, she demonstrates how much easier it is to debunk a theory than to definitively establish one. She leaves herself wide open to this type of critique on pp 124/125 of Chapter 7, wherein she notes that there has never been any proof that thermite was ever used to demolish a high rise building; neither has there been any proof that free-energy has ever been used for that purpose.

Throughout the book, Dr Wood cautions her readers to be wary of first impressions and, especially, of the media's tendency to tell its viewers what they're seeing. Then, in Chapter 3 - "Jumpers" - she proceeds to do exactly that. Figure 30 on page 32 shows a number of people gathered on ledges along the building's facade. It's impossible to say with any certainty what these people are doing there; nevertheless, Dr Wood tells us that they are in the process of disrobing, as if their clothes have become overheated. Now it's true that at least one person appears to be shirtless, but that alone hardly warrants her conclusion that they're all disrobing. It's also true that one person is clearly reaching down, but that certainly doesn't mean he's attempting to remove his pants - he could be doing anything. In fact, it very much looks to me like he's holding on to someone who is already in the process of falling out the window. The implication of their disrobing, by Dr Wood's own admission, is that they are not attempting to escape the heat of fire - which their clothes would help protect their bodies from; but rather a kind of force that makes their clothes unbearably hot. However, later in the book (I forgot to jot down the chapter and page), one of the responders encounters a man whose body was "burnt to a crisp" while his jacket was intact; and, at another point, a responder's coat catches fire while she''s running - even though she was not aware of fires burning around her. Dr Wood points out that directed free-energy seems to "burn" things from the inside out; so it can't both burn the person but not the coat in one instance then turn around and burn the coat and not the person in the next instance. This energy seems, as well, to burn standing vehicles differently in different instances, either the interior or the exterior but rarely both together.

One of the book's strong suites, along with the myriad pictures, charts and graphs, is the eye-witness testimony of first responders. These statements are dotted throughout the book and do, indeed, paint an eerie portrait of the events of 9/11, adding depth to the pictures of various anomalies. The eye-witness accounts help quantify the particular kinds of anomalies Dr Wood identifies in the pictures in that they make it clear that these anomalies are not purely random events but, rather, pieces of a series of inter-related events. Which strengthens her case that every anomaly can - and must - be attributed to a single source.

I think by far the weakest part of Dr Wood's book is Chapter 18 - Hurricane Erin. Clearly I'm not a meteorologist - but neither is Dr Wood. She is puzzled by two things in particular regarding this hurricane: 1) its abrupt turning away from the coastline (it appeared to be headed directly for New York); and 2) its absence from the day's weather forecasts. But this is immanently easy to explain - the first, in fact, explains the second. As Dr Wood notes, a strong cold front had just pushed its way into the eastern United States. She whimsically suggests that the cold front and the hurricane were poised to do battle; but this is simply not the case. Having tuned in to The Weather Channel year after year every time a hurricane developed, I can state almost categorically that there's no contest between a cold front and a hurricane - the front will always win, hands down. In fact, it's not a contest at all. Hurricanes - even the most powerful - are steered by whatever weather systems they encounter; and just as easily diverted from their path. Which precisely explains Hurricane Erin's absence from the weather forecasts. Once it's determined that a particular hurricane poses no threat to the mainland, it immediately falls off the media's radar screen. Only a show like the Weather Channel - which does nothing but the weather (at least at that time) - ever follows a hurricane once it no longer threatens the US.

Dr Wood rightly notes that she need not give us "the exact technology that was used in the destruction, including its make, model and serial number" (p 349); but she most certainly must give us at the bare minimum the range of intensity, duration and location needed by any such directed-energy technology to destroy two of the tallest buildings on the planet. It's simply not acceptable, given the multitude of equations laid out in the book, not to give some ball-park estimate of the energy needed - preferably in the form of an equation. And, even though I accept her conclusion that the cause of the towers' destruction could not have been burning airplane fuel, conventional controlled demolition, thermite or "mini-nukes," I don't entirely accept her conclusion that, therefore, the cause of their destruction must necessarily have been directed free-energy. There could be a sixth candidate for the destruction effected on 9/11: none of the above.

In the history of the world - so far as we know - there has never been an instance of two 110-story buildings being destroyed within an hour of each other. This is a brand new event, that, for all we know, may have open a brand new chapter in physics. How do we know what kind of phenomena might be generated just by the destruction of two massive skyscrapers? And could the act of falling itself create enough energy to tear the building materials apart? And could the destruction of the first tower begin a chain reaction that caused the second tower to likewise fall? And could the cumulative effect of the two towers falling create an energy field capable of bringing down the third building (WTC7)? I wouldn't dream of questioning the basic tenets of physics as we understand it. But isn't that exactly what John Hutchison did when he inadvertently discovered what's come to be known as "The Hutchison Effect?" Maybe there are more "Effects" out there just waiting for the right chain of events to reveal them. Maybe directed free-energy is not at all the last piece of the cosmic puzzle.

UPDATE

After perusing other reviews and, especially, comments posted at the end of reviews, I see no alternative but to lower my estimation of Dr Wood's work. The expression "You are known by the company you keep" comes to mind. I didn't encounter one single comment critical of a previous comment that didn't resort to ad hominem attacks on the person who made the comment. This is true of "both sides" - the DEW's and the thermites. "911," as everyone knows, is one of the most important issues of this nation's history; whether one accepts the official (i.e., airplane/fuel), the controlled demolition, the thermite, the DEW, or even the mini-nuke theory, every effort should be made to raise the debate above the level of name calling. One is not idiotic for not seeing the other's side: there is wiggle room for even the official theory - in fact, in light of the inane bickering between the various factions, the official theory is starting to look a lot less absurd.

Dr Wood's supporters go ballistic whenever anyone accuses her of fabricating death rays in space; and while it's true that she never once proposed such a specific weapon as the likely culprit, it's equally true that she dances all around it - as if to say "See, as long as I don't pronounce the words, I didn't say it!" Well, I'm sorry, but there is absolutely no getting around one extremely uncomfortable fact: if indeed a directed energy weapon was used, it had to be stationed somewhere. And since Dr Wood makes it abundantly clear that the twin towers were disintegrated from the top down, the most likely place for it to be stationed was somewhere above 110 floors. There aren't too many spots in the greater New York area much higher that 110 floors; so unless a DEW with the magnitude to disintegrate close to one million tons of material can be directed from any angle, it becomes exceedingly disingenuous for Dr Wood and her supporters to insist that a death ray in space was the farthest thing from her mind.

Let me point out, also, that I find the Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth every bit as disingenuous in their dismissal of Dr Wood's theory. To put it bluntly, neither theory ties up all loose ends. And above all else, neither theory adequately accounts for the attack on the Pentagon; indeed, Dr Wood doesn't even so much as mention it in passing. Who knows, maybe the two incidents weren't related. Maybe even the infamous "September Clues" paradigm had it right all along. None of it happened; it was all trick photography.

ONE FINAL NOTE: Dr Wood's "Qui Tam" Lawsuit - touted as evidence of her sincerity and selflessness - is against Applied Research Associates, Inc., on behalf of the US Government. If successful, Dr Wood, as "Relator," stands to gain monetarily from the suit. The suit basically accuses Applied Research Associates, Inc., of failing to advise the government of a conflict of interest when it became a contractor for NIST - the conflict of interest being that the company researches and develops Directed Energy Weaponry, yet failed to apprise the government (via NIST) of the possibility of DEW's being used on 9/11. Anyone who's been following Dr Wood's work knows that this "Qui Tam" Lawsuit has been used as a club to beat the thermite proponents over the head: why haven't they brought a lawsuit? The implication is that there's no merit to the thermite argument; but the simple fact is that there's no government contractor the thermite faction can point to as having defrauded the government. That is to say, there's no contractor which appears to have a possible conflict of interest for having worked with thermite yet not having apprised the government of the possibility of thermite being used on 9/11. That's the whole thing in a nutshell. "Qui Tam" is also widely known as the "Whiltleblower" Lawsuit. And that's that

Much like the manner in which this new technology brought the buildings down, even though tragic to say the least, Dr Wood has done an exquisite job of uncovering the truth of that day. What is almost as surprising, is the lack of foresight on behalf of the perpetrators, to cover their tracks. The 'Official Story' is just that, a story, which no longer holds any water. Bravo, Dr Wood. A true American Patriot, in every sense of the word

Packed with information long sought by thinking minds. Finally, someone that can explain the strange anomalies of how a heavily steel girdered tower free fall to the ground. The big media wants you to believe an air plane melted the girders and produced a free fall. Strap your seat belts on and keep an open mind. The forensic investigation is exceptional and the truth has arrived. Dr Judy Wood will erase the media lies and fill in the blanks with what really happened. Five stars.

Couldn't put this one down ! My studies of Tesla made me aware years ago that this technology was available. Dr. Judy Wood puts it all together with an eye opener from cover to cover, BRAVO DR. WOOD !!!

I am only half way through the book, so my review is admittedly premature. I will change the rating later if need be. However, at this point, I give it five stars WHETHER OR NOT DR. WOOD is absolutely correct with her ultimate hypothesis about HOW the buildings were brought down. Her courage, hard work and excellent science are easily five stars if only for proving that the official story is impossible. Although I believe (and remember I'm only half way through) that the new energy weapons may be responsible, I also believe it could have been a combination of nanothermite explosives and energy rays, such as those being developed by Raytheon that I speculated might have been responsible for bringing down Senator Paul Wellstone's airplane when Fetzer and I co-authored, American Assassination: The Strange Death of Senator Paul Wellstone. In any case, I want to use this review as an appeal to the truth movement to stop its in-fighting and concentration on that priority with which we all agree- that the official story is untrue! I have seen too much of the "divide and conquer" contributing to keeping American Indigenous Peoples oppressed. Whether or not our divisions are due to intentional disinformation agents; ignorant apologists for the illusions of American democracy or sincere scholars more wrapped up in academic territorialism than in a legitimate concern about future generations based on the 9/11 lie, we must gather around Dr. Wood's work and support our common ground while continuing to "argue cooperatively" (as I do with my arch-enemy co-author, Dr. Walter Block, in the new book, Differing Worldviews: Two Disagreeing Scholars Argue Cooperatively." It is amazing the common ground we have found.
My one critique of Dr. Wood's book at this point is her over-emphasis on the value of empirical evidence. No good Perry Mason type verdict ever excludes the subjective, whether eye witness accounts or motive. I grant that this was not and should not have been her objective. Others, such as us "soft scientists," also have a role to play. To ignore the other evidence such as that we placed in our Elsevier text, The Hidden History of 9/11, whether stock market puts or military training exercises or even corporate and political motives, would be a mistake.
So I congratulate Dr. Wood on her book and at the same time beg her and others to remember our common ground while we continue pressing forward. And we must remember the bottom line is that no matter what truth or facts emerge, humans who do not emotionally want to believe will not see them nor will the forces responsible for 9/11 allow a legitimate accountability. This said, it is still vital that we get as many people as close to the truth as possible until we can manage ourselves to change the energy field when things get even worse.
Akaywaciankinktay,
Four Arrows (Wahinkpe Topa), aka Don Trent Jacobs, Ph.D., Ed.D. (My real names) [...]

This is not a book of poetry, yet it has some beautiful proes, it is not a novel yet it tell a complete story, it is not a photography book yet the pictures will grab you, it is not just a text book yet its data is emperical, it is not the Bible yet it will be one of the most important books you will read.
I, like many people, have heen caught up in "the story of 911". What I have found has been a lot of half truths and out and out lies. Our way of life, our perceptions of ourselves and the world has been changed, and far too many people here and around the world have been physically, psycologically, and morally destroyed because of the big lie.
This moment in time has chosen Ms Woods to open our eyes and expose us to the truth. Far too many people even after being awaken by this knowledge will be content to go back to sleep and concern themselves with the next sporting event or American Idol winner. This book however, will not let you be comfortable in your slumber, the words and pictures will demand that you be a person of conscious and not accept what has been spoon fed to you.

If the book is not available here do a web search for Judy Wood and you can purchase it from her site.

1st scientific approach using empirical evidence rather than circumstantial that I have seen. I have been a "911 truther", as we are labeled, for years. Rather I am just somebody that does not buy into the official story and just wants to know the truth. We have heard a lot of the holes in the story from NORAD standing down because of war games going on at the exact same time with the exact same scenario to the hi-jackers making impossible moves in the sky with little flight skills. But Dr. Wood takes a forensic look at the evidence and comes to a surprising and frightening conclusion. Everybody needs to read this book.

Knowing how many obstacles have been placed in Dr. Judy Wood's way to prevent her from bringing this book to the reading, thinking, public makes me weep. Yet she persevered. As another reviewer commented, this is the most important book of the 21st century. Indeed it is, so far. Something even better is sure to come along in the next 90 years, but even then, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? will stand out as a monumental achievement. Buy the book.

Visit the website: [...]

You will have an "Ah Ha! " moment when you see what happened. This will probably happen in ten seconds. Magnifico! Dr. Judy!

This fabulous collection of evidence - compiled over many years - and now available in a single compendious volume - will stun you, shock you - AND enlighten you.

Dr Judy Wood has made history in providing the only publicly available scientific and forensic investigation into the events at the WTC.

This includes, for example:

1) Hundreds of photographs, from a collection of tens of thousands
2) Graphs and charts from official reports
3) Graphs and charts that Dr Wood has developed from data available
4) Weather data
5) Magnetometer Data
6) Many Witness accounts
7) Analysis of video

So dangerous and conclusive is the study that it has been a huge struggle to get it into print. So many twists and turns in this story are there that I had to write a book about that side of it all!! 9-11 - Finding the Truth

These 2 books together will give you a good understanding of (1) what happened at the WTC and (2) why you haven't heard about this before.

This woman is courageous and brilliant. She has forever marked her importance in the history of physics with the authoring and release of this book. It is the most thorough (actually, the *only*) forensic analysis available to the people that explains what happened to the World Trade Center Complex on 9/11 and shows a thorough proof of concept of the type of weapon system that may have been used. Hint: the 'planes' are irrelevant, and as Dr. Wood says, "Planes can't turn buildings into powder - real planes can't turn buildings into powder and neither can fake planes."

We all know we were lied to that day
We all saw those buildings turn to dust.
Dust that was NOT hot! ;-)

Dr. Wood peels away the layers of dis-info and psyop in a way that is candid, personal, and endearing. You will laugh, and cry, but most of all, you will learn, "through the eyes of a child, with wonder and amazement."

"A comparison of the 9/11 evidence collected with the evidence of results produced by the well-established Hutchison Effect shows that a similar technology was employed in the destruction of the towers..."--P. 483-484.

The Proposed method of destruction of the Twin Towers; Aluminium Jetliners and their fuel load, is not commeasurate wth the level, the degree and the TOTALITY of destruction. Period.

"The kind of doubt [we see toward this subject] manifest itself as cynicism. Cynicism is actually a self protective mechanism. A cynical stance allows us to feel smart and unthreatened without really being involved. We can look sophisticated and we can remain safely aloof and at a distance. Maybe we are frightened and hold ourselves apart from life rather than grapple with difficult questions. Perhaps habitual suspiction for the situation belittle's all dreams of change until they simply fade and we no longer believe any dreams to be possible. We feel impervious and confidant knowing that we're not gulible and we're not going to be swayed. The cynic not only doubts but also refuses to investigate the object of that doubt. Rather than engaging a person or a problem the cynic says -'what does that have to do with me?' The cynic says 'prove it' without bothering to stick around to question, to see just what proof might be forthcoming." - Sharon Salzberg 'Faith' trusting your own deepest experience

It's great to know that atheists have lost all the impact they had over the 9 - 11 investigation. They wanted to completely control everything 9 - 11 from top to botton but so did the various Christian and Islamic fundamentalist groups accusing each other of the supposed attack. While we have all reached the agreement that no planes were used on that day and the official explanation has been rejected by mainstream science, it remains to be pointed out that the technology used to bring down the towers is NOT Nikola Tesla technology. It can NOT be attributed to Nikola Tesla because there has never been such a thing as Nikola Tesla to begin with. I am not going to comment further about supposed Tesla technology regarding this book, but it's great to see that retarded people are giving it one star reviews which tells something about it's revolutionary impact. Any book given a one star review by a retard is worth the effort of it's publication and this book is no exception. It is said to be well documented and the author clearly tries to the best of her ability to use science to describe precisely what was going on this day. Consequently she is being hated by non secular persons because it is impossible to explain the significance of 9 - 11 - either according to the official politicised version or its many alternatives to such a person because you can not explain answers to complex questions to simpletons. My comment about the book is not directed against those who lost control over the official explanation however, whether they are atheists or following any other religion. My own belief regarding 9 - 11 is that I agree with the actor based reality interpretation, and also that the towers had been brought for economic reasons and it would have been economically unfeasible to use airplanes when other technologies would have been cheaper, such as gravity demping ones or ones involving what we used to call 'free energy'devices back then (my apologies for my clumsy English and the clumsiness by which I attempt to present my logic over this difficult subject). Despite I mention the actor based reality, atheism and so on in my comment it does not mean that that is what the book is focusing on, as all it is doing is attempting to gather as much evidence for or against the author's opinions on the matter and use the scientific method to reach the truth. And whether you are a believer in Tesla or not, you may like the text. Also note that I am deliberately choosing to avoid using the term 'official government explanation'because that could reach to a misunderstanding about governments being accused of being involved in 9 - 11 which have nothing to do with said event. Summary: Judy Wood attempts to use logic, reason and science to put romantic notions of the official version of 9 - 11 aside, namely theories which suggest that the attack was an outside job. Do not use my comment to buy the book. Borrow it from a friend or from a library instead and see if you like it or ask people who have read it if they think it's a great read. My instinct tells me this is a fantastic work, and a great job, and the compilation of evidence presented in where the scientific method has been used is outstanding. I recommend this book for anybody working in government and who is doing other jobs, who is interested in these things or needs to find a quality book for research. Intelligence analysts would also benefit greatly from reading the book because it is one of the least biased 9 - 11 books you can possibly find. Do not however assume that my 9 - 11 library is impressive. It is insultingly unimpressive and I have less than 10 books about the subject. It would be nice if a new version would be published which would be ridiculously thick, possibly a multivolume version so we can have a more thorough examination of missing details.

Eppur si muove (It.) "And yet it moves." Attributed to Galileo Galilei after his first Inquisition hearing.

Dr. Wood, equaling the bravery and scientific inquisitiveness of Galileo, has meticulously researched and presented to us a re-creation of what actually happened on that historical day of September 11, 2001. What she's discovered truly contains implications that are beyond the mere evidence itself. Extremely disturbing questions suddenly become apparent, if one can allow them to form. The answers to these questions are quite disturbing.

For example, if you subscribe to the idea that the event on September 11, 2001 was a very carefully planned operation before it was activated, then, as Dr. Wood herself says, wouldn't the cover-up of how it was done and by whom have to be devised to last for years, decades, ultimately forever? And wouldn't a cover-up by its very nature require people acting as agents of deception inserted under every possible rock which could be potentially turned over by those who are turning over rocks and looking? We have been told by a former head of the C.I.A. that they "...own everyone of significance in the media," and Lenin is said to have stated, "If there is going to be an opposition, we will lead it."

As most people know, there are two official stories. Arabic people hijacked planes and flew them into the towers, and the official alternative version that most of the "9/11 truth patriots" demand that inquiring minds MUST believe. Anyone that challenges their version will face the equivalent of Galileo's Inquisition.

Dr. Wood has maintained her trust in science and the validity of examining the actual evidence and not getting seduced by postulations and claims that are not based on scientific facts. Over the years, she's suffered like Ulysses, while he was tied to the mast as his ship sailed past the Sirens. She's endured these attacks where most of us would have collapsed. Her courage is the material of legends.

This book is the documentation by a scientist of the only forensic inquiry of that event and it answers the questions: what really happened?; what is the definition of evidence?; and what evidence was recoverable at the crime scene? No one other than Dr. Wood with her PROVABLE crime scene evidence has actually challenged any of the government studies in court--one of her challenges traveling all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. All the "truth patriots" have not even tried the first, most obvious course, a court challenge. Why? Nevertheless, we are told by the Lenin side that they have the real evidence, and it has been verified in peer reviewed journals. If they truly have evidence, if they are truly trying to uncover and expose the perpetrators of that attack, why haven't they taken their evidence to court? There is no excuse for not doing that fundamental action.

When you read this book, you might be caught in a double-bind. You can stay in the harbor and worship your 9/11 truth idols, many of whom have mercilessly attacked Dr. Wood and her real evidence, or you can choose to let go of the dock and let the tide of truth take you to Dr. Wood's newly charted territory. There's no shame in recognizing that you were wrong about the self-named "truth movement." Anger is the appropriate response, just as you would be angry if your wife or husband was found to be having an affair. Nearly all of us were blinded by the official government story until several years after that day of infamy. Thanks to Dr. Wood's book, you will immediately see who the agents of deceit are. In fact, their attacks against her are secondary proof that her evidence is accurate and truthful.

As professor Larsen has tells us in his foreword, this IS the most important book of the 21st century. After reading it, you can't help but come to the conclusion that there are persons unknown, but that can be known, that are in control of awesome tools that can create either science fiction-like destruction or unimaginable benefits for humanity. On September 11, 2001 their version of that technology was debuted, and not for us but for the Russians, Chinese, and other foreigners in high military, business, and political positions. As Dr. Wood rightly says, it's: "The New Hiroshima."

Today, the world is facing an escalation of danger on all fronts which appear to be engineered by the same persons that created the World Trade Center attacks. Only a person living under a rock would not be aware of the unprecedented disaster that life on this planet is facing and that is clearly unopposed, which if unstopped, will likely lead to an Armageddon-like event, possibly WWIII. Unacknowledged by government officials, chemtrails cover most planetary skies. Why and for what purpose? The Georgia Guidestones announce that the human population needs to be slimmed down to 500 million souls. Is that a warning to all of us? The weather appears to be completely under human control, manufacturing the global weather instability that the Al Gores and Greenpeaces want us to believe we are causing. Wouldn't this lie help increase the implementation of a police state in every country? The global financial system has clearly been engineered to the point now where it is teetering on collapse. Who benefits from this? Last year, we nearly had a bioweapon released against the planet which would have given the U.N. signatory countries, nearly all, the right to force unknown substances into our bodies against our wills. Are you willing to resist this? The North American Union is still moving ahead. Is that the will of the people? Airport travelers are now treated like entrants to a prison. Are you willing to submit to this violation of your body just to fly somewhere? The ramping up of the encirclement of Russia and China is dangerously progressing unabated. Where and when will they draw the line? I won't go on. Our politicians are either incredibly ignorant about all of this or they know fully well about it and are aiding and abetting in our destruction. Either way, we're on our own.

What can you do? Buy and read this book and tell everyone you know to do the same. It is absolutely essential that as many persons as possible know this information. The clock is ticking. There's no time to lose.

-
------------------------------------------------"WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO"
-----------------------------------------------By Judy Wood,BS., MS., PHD.
-
--------------------------I'M GREATLY IMPRESSED WITH PICTURES NEVER BEFORE MADE AVAILABLE
-
---------------------------------------- ----THERE IS NO 'INDEX'! WHY?
-
------------------------------------------I couldn't find "NANOTHERMITE"?
-
Ms. Wood's criticism of "Thermite" does not apply to the Demolition of the "World Trade Center Complex' because the product detected to have been used is "NANO-THERMITE" or, "SUPER-THERMITE a 'totally different product which is "designed to 'greatly' increase "reaction rate" and is 'compounded'
with HIGH EXPLOSIVE MATERIAL!
-
"Super-thermites are generally developed for military use, 'propellants, explosives', and pyrotechnics(!)
-
Their "HIGHLY INCREASED" "REACTION RATE", is several times more powerful than conventional explosives(!)
-
Ms. Wood also is 'presuming' that 'there was no opportunity to "stealthily" complete the 'placement of
such 'explosive' material, and that there is no means by which a "Canine Squad" dog could be 'fooled'
into failing to 'smell' the presence of "Bombs"!
-
Research would show that Contractors hired to make 'major repairs' of Elevators a/or Electric Wiring were working in the building for months, OR, years! And there was evidence of excessive noise, and concrete dust emanating from several unoccupied floors!
-
Also, it was reported by someone in lower floors that "EXPLOSIONS" in floors below them, occurred prior
to Planes hitting the upper floors!
-
And, 'if' A "Tesla"-like Ray" (such as "HARP") were used, there 'very likely' would have been much
less 'solid' debris for trucks to remove, and, a great deal more "Dust Particles" to be VACUUMED UP!
-

I suspect that most who read these reviews have already read the book and have an opinion so I'll take the time to say that if Judy Wood is not a limited hangout/govt shill, she might as well be one.

Before you get all irate, ask yourself this: What has been/is the end result of Wood's work/thesis (and maybe combine this with reading 'The Most Dangerous Book in the World')? Answer: The group running the world can do whatever they want and do it from the platform of space (plus are Evil, yes, with a capital 'E'). They can instantly vaporize you if they choose.

Sort of reminds me of the Ed Snowden/Michael Hastings Op. Snowden's 'coming out' and Hastings's grisly murder occurred more or less simultaneously. I believe it was to send a message to journalists: 'Annoy us and we'll fry you.' (Why else kill Hastings in so public/obvious a manner?) The ultimate Panopticon Effect. Ditto Wood's work.

There are other reasons I suspect Wood is bad. I'll not list all of them but her refusal (after 15 years) to name the perpetrators is up there, as is her accusations re Jim Fetzer, who did more to help her in the beginning than anyone (a matter of public record) and who - despite some quirks - is the only alt media figure unafraid to spill any theory that has merit (his blind spots include global warming and a naivety towards mainstream science in general).

Wood's bizarre claim that she 'has no theory' is more an indication of her shaky mind-state than her motives (her theory is that a DEW was used on 9/11 and it's on the cover of the book) - it does bear mentioning. When I first read her book (years ago) I wrote her and after two paragraphs of congratulations on her great work, etc. I mentioned that thermite probably WAS used (along with a DEW), to cut the plane holes if nothing else. Wood wrote back all irate, accusing me of trying to 'tear down' her work. If this sounds like an exaggeration, search for 'Jim Fetzer's bizarre phone call to Judy Wood' on Youtube and listen to how irrational she is. (The title of the vid is an indication of her cult status - always a bad sign - since it was Wood who showed 'bizarre' behavior.)

Anyway, alt media is 90% limited hangout and the only way to suss the good from the bad is to ask yourself 'What is the main result of this person's work?' (Careful reading indicates that Wood's qui tam court case is itself a limited hangout.)

As I say, I don't know for sure that Wood is a limited hangout, but if not, she might as well be.

This review concerns the hard copy of "Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology On 9/11" by Dr. Judy Wood and published in 2010. This book title will be referenced from here on out as WDTTG.

First of all, 9/11 was an inside job. The buildings did not collapse due to fire and gravity as stated by the official conspiracy theory put forward by the US government and media. So what did bring down the buildings and who was responsible?

This book argues that the mechanism for destruction was some type of unknown, unspecified, unidentified Directed Energy Weapon hereafter referred to as a DEW. The book fails to convince the objective reader for several reasons which this review will detail over the course of its development.

This review will be added to over time to eventually comprise my arguments regarding the content of the book and of the culture surrounding this book. My comments linked to in this review will provide a more detailed analysis of sections of the book and a discussion of controversies surrounding the book the its author.

***** THEORY and SPECULATION, JUMPERS *****
Permalink: http://www.the store.com/review/R1R28JUX20N1UG/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0615412564&cdForum=Fx5DIOC2TN736T&cdMsgID=Mx2ZQP74T838Q5J&cdMsgNo=1&cdPage=1&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx15S9Y4WKBDL4W&store=books#Mx2ZQP74T838Q5J

***** SOME QUESTIONS *****
Permalink: http://www.the store.com/review/R1R28JUX20N1UG/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0615412564&cdForum=Fx5DIOC2TN736T&cdMsgID=Mx39986ZTY5YC1L&cdMsgNo=2&cdPage=1&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx15S9Y4WKBDL4W&store=books#Mx39986ZTY5YC1L

***** DR. WOOD'S INFAMOUS COURT CASES *****
Permalink: http://www.the store.com/review/R1R28JUX20N1UG/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0615412564&cdForum=Fx5DIOC2TN736T&cdMsgID=Mx3U79QVLASFL1Q&cdMsgNo=4&cdPage=1&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx15S9Y4WKBDL4W&store=books#Mx3U79QVLASFL1Q

***** WHERE'S THE DEW? *****
http://www.the store.com/review/R1R28JUX20N1UG/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0615412564&cdForum=Fx5DIOC2TN736T&cdMsgID=Mx2VL41ZGJV841C&cdMsgNo=16&cdPage=2&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx15S9Y4WKBDL4W&store=books#Mx2VL41ZGJV841C

***** WDTTG CULTURE: REPEATED ATTACKS WITHOUT PROOF AND REFUSAL TO ANSWER QUESTIONS *****
http://www.the store.com/review/R1R28JUX20N1UG/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0615412564&cdForum=Fx5DIOC2TN736T&cdMsgID=Mx1L3EPU7P7XYNX&cdMsgNo=5&cdPage=1&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx15S9Y4WKBDL4W&store=books#Mx1L3EPU7P7XYNX

***** THE 9/11 COMMISSION - National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States *****
Permanlink: http://www.the store.com/review/R1R28JUX20N1UG/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&asin=0615412564&cdForum=Fx5DIOC2TN736T&cdMsgID=Mx20JIETPXLROTU&cdMsgNo=28&cdPage=3&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx15S9Y4WKBDL4W&store=books#Mx20JIETPXLROTU

***** OTHER REVIEWS OF INTEREST SHOWING THE BEHAVIOR OF DR. WOOD'S FOLLOWERS *****

1) Impressive but severely flawed argument by elimination, May 20, 2012 By James H. Fetzer
Permalink: http://www.the store.com/review/RC0R225GYLP3J/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0615412564

2) How the Towers turned to dust, April 1, 2011 By Alan S. Glassman "pleromata"
Permalink: http://www.the store.com/review/R1VABIZJ14CZ8F/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0615412564

Judy Wood provides photos that many have not seen, but no evidence that "directed free-energy technology" was used to destroy World Trade Center 1 and 2. Before one entertains this theory, one must determine if it is technically feasible.

When one considers the possibility of directed energy ("free-energy" or otherwise) weapons having been used to destroy World Trade Center 1 and 2, a little research shows that this is not technically feasible.

The goal of the High Energy Liquid Laser Area Defense System, launched following a research breakthrough by DARPA in 2003, was to fabricate and demonstrate a system with an output power of 15 kW. "Based on the results of this demonstration, additional laser modules [would] be developed... to produce a 150 kW laser weapon system demonstrator."

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Directed Energy Weapons in its December 2007 report proposed 1-3 MW (i.e. 1000 to 3000 kW) Free Electron Laser prototype in 2020.

Note that a few years after the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, directed energy weapons of the order of 15kW, to 3000 kW by the year 2020, were targets for development. A 15 kW system was yet to be "fabricated and demonstrated".

Could a 15 kW directed energy weapon (not yet developed in 2001) have brought down the World Trade Center?

To put this in perspective, "Measurements show a house will occasionally use as much as 15 kilowatts for short intervals".

In other words, the 15 kW directed energy weapon (not yet developed in 2001) is equivalent to the maximum demand for a typical house. Even a 3000 kW directed energy weapon (a target for 2020) would be equivalent to the maximum demand for 200 homes.

One doesn't need to do any calculation to conclude that directed energy weapons available in 2001 were not sufficient to bring down the World Trade Center. Even directed energy weapons targeted for development by 2020 would not be sufficient to bring down the World Trade Center.

Therefore, one may safely conclude that a directed energy weapon having been used to destroy World Trade Center 1 and 2 is not technically feasible.

At the very least, Judy Wood needs to answer the following:
- What is the required size (MW, physical) of the DEW?
- What was the source of energy for the DEW?
- Where was the DEW placed?

To be taken seriously, proponents of any theory need to show how they jump form their evidence to their conclusion.

My rating is for the photographs, not for Judy Wood's arguments or conclusions.

Enver Masud
Author of the FREE book "9/11 Unveiled"

PS - the store.com deleted the original review because of the link to my book at the store.com. They do allow a "signature block" with one book identified.

This government shill Wood is knowingly ignorant. Her job is simply to discredit the 911 truth movement.
Woods along with others such as reynolds and Fetzer bring ridiculous theories into the discussion resulting in many people ignoring the actual hard factual evidence.
Also shes an ugly hag who apparently never tips the barista, and is frequently late bringing dvds back to the library.
98% of these pos reviews are also shills, since no one in their right mind would buy into woods evil nonsense. The other 2% of pos reviews are from people with developmental disabilities who really like laser beams.

Any person who believes energy weapons or mini nukes were used in the destruction of the wtcs is not to be listened to.

Why? exactly...
Why would the towers be destroyed with energy weapons when standard explosive demolition has done a great job of destroying buildings thus far.
Compare the wtc collapse with any building demolition, it looks the same right?
Now compare these thousands of videos of explosive demolitions with buildings demolished with energy weapons. Go ahead compare them... oh right, energy weapons have never demolished a building so there is no comparison.

So what is it? something everyone can look at and see? Or is it something that nobody has ever seen?
If you're going to listen to someone who cannot provide ONE example to prove their theory, you might as well claim Aliens did 9-11 while you're at it.
And then you might get on the Joe Rogan show.
Lets look just a bit closer to the 3 theories regarding the 3 wtc collapses.
#1 Fire managed to destroy 3 wtc buildings is the official explanation for the collapses.
#2 Pre positioned explosives designed to destroy all 3 towers.
#3 Some other top secret method that if it exists only the US military has it or knows about it.

#1 From empirical evidence we know that fire has never caused a skyscraper to collapse before or after 9-11. Nor has an airplane.
#2 From empirical evidence, eye witness testimony, video evidence, physical evidence, the evidence of pre positioned explosives does exist in massive quantities. Explosives have successfully demolished buildings for decades.
#3 Nobody has ever seen any evidence the military, or any other agency uses any type of directed energy weapon to destroy buildings. There is however ample evidence that they used explosives exclusively to destroy buildings for decades. I looked for videos, testimony and physical evidence for "energy weapons" and there is none.

So, of the 3 presented methods potentially used only ONE method has had any success at any time in known documented history.
That would be the one that demolition specialists get paid for.

But the main problem is when you go see Judy's live presentation shes always been drinking Guinness and eating lots of trail mix and yogurt and she farts up the place to high heaven.

Rather than advance a theory of her own, Judy Wood, Ph.D., has brought together an enormous quantity of high quality evidence that functions as a partial foundation for evaluating alternative explanations. What she has done has classically been referred to as a "prolegomenon", or as a prelude to further research. The word "indirect" belongs in her subtitle, since "Indirect Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11" is a less misleading and closer approximation.

She demonstrates that the Twin Towers cannot possibly have collapsed and that some massive source of energy was required to blow them apart and convert them into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust. That also cannot have been done by thermite / thermate / nanothermite. She offers reasons for doubting that it was done by using nukes, but her arguments actually only rule out large nukes in the subbasements, not sophisticated arrangements of micro or mini nukes.

New evidence based upon the US Geological Survey's dust samples indicates that the destruction of the Twin Towers was primarily a nuclear event. The most important defect in her book is the failure to report or come to grips with the presence of Barium and Strontium, Thorium and Uranium, Lithium, Lanthanum, Yttrium, Chromium and Tritium, where she mentions the latter but inexplicably minimizes the values for Tritium that were obtained, which was scientifically irresponsible.

The idea that Directed Energy Weapons were used is seriously under-developed, where her strongest claim is that DEWs provide vastly more energy than conventional explosives and can be directed. Anyone familiar with the gross observable evidence knows the former to be true, where mini or micro nukes--not to mention a new positron anti-matter technology--satisfy both conditions. For the latest and best on how it was done, serious students should check out The Vancouver Hearings.

--James H. Fetzer, Ph.D., Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth

I ordered a brand new book and I received it bent to hell. The theories that this so called doctors states in this book are so off the wall. Thermite and well placed explosives brought down the 3 wtc on 9/11.

Before wasting your money on this book, I suggest you Google the video called, "Dr Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood." Hopefully that will convince you to spend your money on something worthwhile. If you are looking for an explanation about what may have happened on 9/11, I suggest you check out Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. As of this date, there are 1,637 architects and engineers and 14,021 others who have signed the petition at the A & E website demanding a truly independent WTC investigation. In contrast, I went to Dr Judy Wood's website and also did a Google search for her supporters and couldn't find much of anything.

This ridiculous book reminds me of the story of the inventor, the king, and the minister. The inventor brings his amazing new invention to court, to show the king. The invention works perfectly and everyone is amazed. The king is pleased at the new invention and says he wants to give the inventor a prize. But the king's minister is jealous of the inventor. He says to the inventor, "Your invention may work in practice, but does it work in theory?"

The inventor is dumbfounded. "What do you mean? You have seen for yourself that it works! Who cares about theory when you have seen it with your own eyes?"

The minister replies, "What we have seen with our own eyes means nothing. You have many tricks. How do I know this is not a clever illusion? You must prove that your invention works in theory! Show me the calculations!"

With a sigh, the inventor says,"You're a freakin' idiot, that's what you are! You need to get a life!"

I'm unwilling to buy in on imaginative speculation US developed directed energy weapons that brought down the world trade center if, in so doing, I must dismiss all the evidence involving the presence of nanothermite/thermate and molten metal at Ground Zero weeks after 9/11. I am quite confident some of Wood's advocates who feel they are well read are not as well read as they claim to be.

In April 2009, along with six other authors, prominent researchers Chenist Niels Harrit, Physicist Jeffry Farrer and Physicist Steven Jones published their findings in the peer-reviewed paper, "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" in Open Chemical Physics Journal. I suggest watching all of the Toronto Hearings that took place for four days around Sept 11th 2011. Niels Harrit provide well-supported research findings on the presence of active nanothermite (superthermite) and possibly military-grade thermate. Either of these chemical compounds require a precise production process. The gray/red chips were not from a painting undercoating process. In addition, there was a presentation of econometric research showing the PUT options prior to 9/11 were statistically improbable, with a high degree of confidence. NIST failed to investigate for explosives and the 9/11 Commission was definately wrong in their assertion the PUT options were of no significance. Niels Harrit's work and the PUT option research were presentated at the Toronto Hearings around Sept 11, 2011 and are reviewed in the Toronto Report, published in 2013.

Whether a strong advocate of Judy Wood's theory or not, we should all be supporting a complete and thorough investigation of 9/11. It's not always what's said and addressed in a book but what isn't addressed that is the devil in the detail. There's a need to discredit current and accepted conspiracy advocates. As is often the compulsion with some new and novel concept or theory, there's a compulsion to throw out the baby with the bathwater in doing so. However, I expect those who support Judy Wood remain supportive of an investigation which includes the possibility of controlled demolitions, explosives and the use of nano-sized thermite and/or military-grade thermate in the destruction of the twin towers, Building 7 and/or quite possibly, the Pentagon. I suspect there are those within the Judy Wood's movement who are simply using her platform as a means to dismiss evidence regarding the use controlled demolitions and nanothermite/thermate. These despicable individuals purpose is to dismantle the Truth Movement from within and likely receive some sort of reward beyond a pat on the their heads. The ignorance commonly portrayed by the masses in the United States is most ideal for main stream who have other agendas than the best interest of the American people.

"How fortunate for government that people they administer don't think"
Adolf Hitler

Watch in the Toronto Hearings, the analysis of "rocket trails" coming off the huge cloud of debris when the Twin Towers fell and how they abruptly moved in a different direction in the smoke plume. Some of the nano-thermite reacted and cause the collapse of the buildings, some was reactive during its expulsion in the smoke plume and some remained reactive in the debris. Delve further and understand the significance of what is meant by nano-sized thermite particles. Read in many sources about the experiments conducted on the red/gray particles and how the performance characteristics of the tested samples support the existence of nanothermite over simpler thermite. Read what thermate is and its value in cutting steel. The presence of sulfur in the thermite suggests the presence of military grade thermate. Please note that sulfur does not result from sulfate. Thrmate reaches higher yet temperatures than thermite and are better suited for melting steel to molten iron. Thermate is well suited as a "cutter" charge. Try to explain the various abrupt rocket trails by the concept of Wood's theory of Dustification alone. For further information, I also respectfully suggest obtaining the "9/11 Toronto Report." The report includes a detailed, critical review by an independent council on the reported evidence and research by the 9/11 Truth Movement. The council consisted of four distinguished individuals: Ferdinado Imposimato, Honarary President of the Supreme Court of Italy and former Senior Investigative Judge on terrorism, Herbert Jenkins, Professor Emeritus at McMaster University, David Jenkins, Professor Emeritus at University of Tennessee and Richard Lee, Professor Emeritus at University of Toronto.

Stratesec was the security company which held the contract for the Twin Towers, including Building 7, United Airlines and Dulles Airport. In the decade before 9/11, KuwAm held a controlling interest in Stratesec.

Barry McDaniel was the COO of Statesec and came to Stratesec directly from BDM International, where he was VP and when BDM was a major subsidiary of The Carlyle Group. Prior to his work at BDM, McDaniel was the Deputy Director for Readiness at the U.S. Army Material Command (AMC). When McDaniel started at BDM they began getting a large amount of government business in what the Navy referred to as "black projects." BDM was a prominent contractor in advanced weapons research. McDaniel coming to Stratesec would make sense if there was a need for someone to manage an important project involving the distribution of military ordinance (i.e. explosives).

McDaniel's arrival at Stratesec coincided with the company's new contract for extensive work at the WTC and the start of a project to install new fireproofing in the towers in 1996. The correlation was remarkable; precisely where the plane hit Tower 1 is where the most extensive fireproofing took place. Flight 11 struck the exact 8 floors, out of 110 floors that had been fully upgraded with new "fireproofing." The thickness of this fireproofing was in the order of 3.25 inches, more than twice what was needed for fireproofing. The extra thick fireproofing could've had the super-thermite/thermate and necessary electrical components for incendiary or explosive devices hidden beneath the outer layer of fireproofing.

Rudy Guliani's Dept of Buildings (DOB) was supposed to inspect the upgrades, but it never did. In fact, the DOB took steps to weaken the city's oversight of WTC fire code compliance, which allowed tenants to make modifications without the intrusion of city government. Tenants like March & McLennan and Joseph Kasptuys' Baseline Financial, located in the impact zones of the Twin Towers, made unsupervised modifications in the exact areas that were impacted. There were opportunities for other companies to plant explosives as well.

Acme Elevator company obtained the contract for servicing the elevators and did an extensive project to upgrade the Twin Towers elevator system. Steel columns which were situated adjacent to and accessible from inside the elevator shafts failed at an early stage of the twin tower's respective collapses. Turner Construction and Phoenix Fireproofing were involved in Fireproofing upgrades as well. An intensive criminal investigation into the companies fireproofing and providing work on the elevators might reveal all that has been hidden by the 9-11 Commission.

Susan Lindauer, a CIA asset before 9/11, was imprisoned for five years under Bush's Patriot Act. She has a story to tell you can find on Utube regarding the vans around the complex in early morning hours, which went on for weeks before 9/11. Christopher Bollyn's "Solving 9/11" notes five Israeli secret service agents were arrested on 9/11/01 in the vicinity of the Twin Towers. These men were allegedly movers but the company, "Urban Moving Systems" of Weehawken, New Jersey was later exposed as a Mossad "front" company. The van they were driving tested positives for explosives. All five were sent back to Israel instead of to Gitmo. Initially there was tremendous news media coverage of these individuals and then suuddenly, no coverage at all. Two months after their arrest they were sent to where? Gitmo? Nope, they were sent back to Israel. What "get out of jail" did they have? In November 2001, three of them commented in Hebrew on an Israeli local television network; their purpose for being in New York was to document the 9/11 tragedy. For some who prefer to believe so, it was a mere coincidence there was evidence of explosives in their van the morning of 9/11, but was was previously contained explosives doing in their van?

We all saw Star Wars when it came out. I suppose everyone except Reagan perceived the laser beams in this movie were just special effects. Reagan sacrificed the best potential gains in limiting Nuclear Armament during peace talks with Gorbachov because Reagan wasn't willing to terminate the Star Wars Technology program. Reagan's actions did NOT necessarily mean Reagan really had anything awesome existing in Star Wars technology. Instead, it was more likely a good indicator Reagan wasn't willing to tell Military Industrial Complex lobbyists to get the hell out of the Congressional and Executive branch hallways. Gorbachov should have been praised for his greater efforts and willingness than Reagan to put an end to the escalating build up of nuclear armament. As usual, we get a President who could've been better and rise to the occasion. Instead, as more often is the case, we got a President better prepared to serve the best interest of lobbyists eager to thicken the financial portfolio of many of willing elected officials. Another example of getting a lesser president for the people is when party leaders in the Democratic party such as Jimmy Byrnes got V.P. Henry Wallace replaced by Harry Truman in a democratic primary election by the usual methods of bribery during the primaries. The American voter has been betrayed by deceptive campaing practices, control over our news media and money flowing from corporate interests to buy the candidate that suites their best interest, not ours.

I much prefer facts. If it looks like a duck, waddles like a duck and quacks like a duck then it's probably a duck. Let me stay near the evidence. But let's stop for a moment and ask where is the evidence and how do we access it? Are there laws in place that will impede eventual disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act?

In a book published by Mathias Broeckers "Conspiracies, Conspiracy Theories and Secrets of 9/11" he notes in accordance with the Presidential Records Act, an outgoing president can impose a twelve year restriction on public access to documents that involve confidential communication between the president and his advisors. Mr Broeckers initially published this book in 2006 as original German work. After twelve years, the law provides that documents be made available to the public upon request. Let's take a look back to Reagan archives with regard to this twelve year rule. In 2006, the National Archives' Reagan Presidential Library informed Bush's White House; documents were about to be released to the public. The first reaction by Bush Jr was to direct the Archives to wait eight months while it studied the issue. A new executive order by Bush Jr. resulted, whereby the former president and incumbent president were permitted an unlimited amount of time to review ANY documents the Archives proposes to release after the twelve year rule. This new executive order requires the Archives abide by the direction of the former president who can object to any of this information being released to the public and they remain secret. I suppose this executive order by Bush Jr will forever keep his secrets hidden from the Freedom of Information Act, unless there's another Executive order rescinding it, by a President who doesn't wish to perpetuate the lies.

"No people can be both ignorant and free."
Thomas Jefferson

In American Behavorial Scientist Feb 2010 Professor Lance deHaven-Smith articulated the notion of SCAD (State Crimes Against Democracy). Let's consider what should be included in crimes of the state. Paul Rea, PhD wrote an outstanding book titled, "Mounting Evidence, Why we need a new investigation into 9/11." Rea references a New Yorker magazine article 7/7/2008 where Cheney proposed building PT boats to resemble those of Iran, manning them with Navy Seals dressed as Iranians and having them fire upon a US ship in the Straits of Hormuz. How about Cheney as an enemy of the state? In a memoir by General Hugh Shelton, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, revealed that a member of Clinton's cabinet proposed setting up the Iraqis by having them shoot down an American spy plane. For a look at a Joint Chief Chairman who was culpable, google Operation Northwoods proposed by General Lemnitzer during JKF's term. Judge Napolitano details many false flag operations involving the US Govt in his book, "The lies the government told you."
Is it really that hard to imagine our government might be complicate in the death of people if it is the means to attain a goal, such as imbedding something like the "Bush Doctrine" and invading other soverign countries?

Since most haven't seen this research detailed, I would like to comment further on the nanothermite (super-thermite) discovered in the twin towers rubble. Employing spectrographic and electron microscope technology, researchers found both aluminosilicate and iron-rich microspheres (formed by droplets of molten metal) in the dust. For these particles to form, temperatures had to reach at least 2,625 and 2,800 degree Fahrenheit respectively. This would help explain the intensely hot fires at Ground Zero. Steven Jones, PhD provides a peer-reviewed open-access "Journal of 9/11 Studies" Through the Freedom of Information Act Jones found evidence for a microsphere rich in molybdenum, which requires a melting point of 4,753 degrees Fahrenheit. Nanothermite reaches temperatures of at least 4,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Also present at the WTC site were microscopic two-sided red-gray chips. When heated to 830 degrees F the red side burns intensely. (Chemical Physics journal Jan 2009). Fragments of unignited thermite were later discovered in the dust as well. No one has claimed that only nanothermite was solely used to commit this dastardly deed. Sulfur was also found in the rubble and is not found in nanothermite.
There are five pieces of evidence I'd like to provide to lend support it was nanothermite and not simply macro thermite found in the rubble.
I. The primary ingredients on the red side of the two-sided chip were ultrafine grains at the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers. This small size of 120 nanometers qualifies the iron oxide particles to be characterized as nono-thermite or super-thermite
II. There was a hypothesis the red-gray chips were paint chips instead of nanothermite. To investigate further, a flame was applied to the red/gray chip. The result was a high-speed hot particle ejection, something not expected from a paint particle.
III. A third reason to embrace the belief it was nanothermite and not ordinary macro thermite was the temperature at which the red-gray chip reacted. Ordinary thermite does not ignite until heated above 900 degrees F. The red/gray chip ignited at 430 degrees F.
IV. The ingredients of the red side of the chip contained aluminum, iron and oxygen components and were intimately mixed at the scale of 100 nanometers or less.
V. Further evidence the red colored side was nanothermite was it being porous and containing silicon as one of its main ingredients. When nanothermite is mixed in a sol-gel, silicon compounds are often used. So that, when the mixture dries, it forms a porous reactive material.

There were no planes with jet fuel that hit Building 7. Building 7 dropping in virtual free fall descent is the "smoking gun" and not the twin towers. Much of the lame arguments that supported Saudi Terrorists acting alone pertained to jet fuel running down elevator shafts and weakening the supportive steel-framed core of the twin towers. Of course, the jet fuel temperatures did not exceed the melting point of steel support framework but with respect to Building 7, the significance of jet fuel descending elevator shafts is a moot point with Building 7 and is not applicable.

A quote by Yogi Berra, "you can observe a lot just by watching."

A high school physics teacher named David Chandler made a video seen on U-Tube, "WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial". Mr Chandler uncloaked the issue of whether Building 7 fell in free fall or not. David Chandler presented his findings at the Toronto Hearings.

When accepted physics theory is applied to the Twin Towers, the official story does not hold up. Physics doesn't suddenly get referred to as "Conspiracy Physics," but the physicists who applied these principles of physics are called "Conspiracy theorists." When you can't kill the message you simply kill the messenger's reputation.

Contrary to what some advocates of Judy Wood insist at the cost of ignoring reality, there was also molten metal at ground zero. I've seen pictures and testimony by highly qualified eye witnesses such as Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolitions, Inc. The witnesses mistakenly described this molten metal as "molten steel" When steel is subjected to thermite the product is molten iron, not molten steel. You will need to overlook this wording error used by eye witnesses in the testimony they provided. Some argue the molten metal pouring out of toward the higher levels Twin Towers was molten aluminum, not molten iron. The color of this metal pouring out was yellow. Iron is yellow when molten, while molten aluminum is colored silver. I am refering though to the hots spots at Ground Zero and here is some of the testimony:
Leslie Robertson, a member of the engineering firm that designed the Twin Towers, reportedly said during a speck in early October 2001, "As of twenty one days after the attack, the fires were still burning and molten steel was still running." This statement was reported by James Williams, the president of the Structural Engineers Association of Utah.
Firefighters at Ground Zero also reportedly spoke of having "encountered rivers of molten steel." One of those firefighters was Captain Philip Ruvolo, who said, "You'd get down below and you'd see molten steel, molten steel, running down the channel rails, like you're in a foundry, like lava."
Other people at the site reported the same findings. Greg Fuchek, VP of a company that supplied computer equipment to identify human remains said, "Sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel."
Dr Ronal Burger of the Nat'l Center for Environmental Health spoke of "Feeling the heat, seeing the molten steel."
Dr Alison Geyh of the John Hopkins School of Public Health, who headed up a scientific team that went to the site shortly after Sept 11th said, "Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is intense. In some pockets now being uncovered they are finding molten steel."

As I've noted, some who advocate the Judy Wood's theory are intent at using Wood's book as a platform from which to dismiss well-founded evidence. It appears eye witness reports of molten metal have to be dismissed and our understanding redirected from what we are told by highly qualified research scientists regarding the exact characteristics of thermite in order to embrace Judy Woods' theory over all others. Might some of these Wood advocates be planted to simply help dismantle the truth movement from within? The evidence on the existence of nanothermite was published and subjected to peer review. The research stands unopposed.

As noted in "War is a racket" by Marine Major General Smedley Butler, "War is a racket. It always has been. It is probably the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives."

As noted in Naom Chomsky's "On Western Terrorism," between fifty to fifty-five million people have died around the world as a result of Western colonialism and Neo-colonialism since the end of World War II. This relatively short period of time has arguably seen the greatest number of massacres in human history. The United States is self-immunized from any prosecution. When the US joined the World Court in 1946, the US basically initiated the Modern International Court of Justice, which it joined with the reservation that the U.S. cannot be tried on any international treaty, such as the UN Charter, The Charter of of the Organization of the American States or the Geneva Convention. Where has the U.S. Interfered you might ask? A few examples include the Iranian Coup in 1953, CIA-backed coup in Guatamala 1954, Assassination in 1961 of Lumumba, the first democratically-elected prime minister in the Republic of the Congo, Brazilian Coup in 1964, attempted coup 1965 in Indonesia, coup in Chile 1973, Salvadoran civil war 1979-92, U.S. invasion of Panama 1989 and the Honduran coup in 2009. When the Nicaragua brought a case against the U.S. at the World Court for the terrorist attacks against Nicaragua, most of the case was thrown out because it invoked the charter of the Organization of American States. Though the charter bars interventions strongly; the U.S argued it was not subject to that and the court accepted it.

Anyone who consider it's impossible our government would take part in any operation that could result in the needless suffering and death of thousands, they need only look at American history to know that it is possible if there's often an agenda that supercedes any moral compass. The New World Order, much like corporate interests involving Nicaragua or Haiti, have created a "groupthink" mentality in some of our government's highest offices. A "groupthink" can manifest as a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing and moral judgement, with an illusion of invulnerability and overestimation of a group's self worth.

If you are fortunate enough to watch the entire Toronto Hearings, take note on the speech by ex-Senator Michael Gravel. As described by Gravel, there are only two venues for change in our country: one is the government, wherein lies the problem, and the people. We the people need a vehicle to move forward when it appears we are willing to be informed where our politicians are not. Gravel notes we are disenfranchised, and he introduced the National Initiative, a meta-legislation whereby the people become a "senior partner" in the policy making process. The National initiative refers to proposals within the United States to allow for ballot initiatives at the federal level. This is being proposed by Mike Gravel, the Democracy Foundation, a non-profit non-governmental organization. Some notable endorsers of the National Initiative for Democracy include Ralph Nader, Noam Chomsky, Tom Atlee, and Howard Zinn. The National Initiative for Democracy (NI4D) is a proposed constitutional amendment (Democracy Amendment) which recognizes the people's right to make laws at the local, state and federal level of every jurisdiction in the country and a federal law (Democracy Act) which spells out orderly procedures for the people to develop and vote on laws. The National Initiative does not change or eliminate Congress, the President, or the Judicial Branch of government. Laws created by initiative must still stand up in the courts just like laws created by Congress. The National Initiative adds an additional check, THE PEOPLE, to America's system of checks and balances, while setting up a working partnership between the People and their elected representatives.

In an interview of Jim Garrison by Johnny Carson....Garrison took a lot of hammering since there was a concerted effort to bash anyone who didn't accept the theory of a lone gunman in the JKF assassination. In response, Garrison stated "It took six thousand to do nothing and we're moving with five. It it's a little bit slow, I apologize."

The Truth Movement has provided suitable evidence to justify a complete and thorough investigation into the events surrounding 9/11. Let's not give cause to question the evidence and give our government an opportunity to squirm out of their duty to us. Please continue to advocate a full investigation. I look forward to Bush Jr and Cheney apart from each other, put before a truly investigative committee and answering questions under oath, with open doors. What we got with the 9/11 Commission was Bush Jr sitting alongside Cheney, not under oath and their responses behind closed doors.

This book is another way to profit from the attacks of 9/11/2001. her creative theory of what caused the twin towers to come down is just that, a creative theory. the details of the collapses are as everyone knows them to be. the north tower was hit around the 96th floor which means there was roughly 14 floors of weight above its impact zone, the south tower was hit around the 78th and 82nd floors which means there was roughly 32 floors of weight above the lowest point of its impact zone. so there was about twice the weight above the impact zone in the south tower as there was above the impact zone in the north tower. the north tower collapsed after 102 minutes while the south tower collapsed after 56 minutes, so the south tower fell in roughly half of the time as the north tower did. the fires in the towers were not hot enough to melt the steel but @2000 degrees they were hot enough to weaken the steel to the point the undestroyed steel could no longer support the above weight. to sum up: the fires in the south tower weakened the undestroyed steel about twice as fast as the fires in the north tower due to roughly twice the amount of weight above the impact zone in the south tower as there was above the impact zone in the north tower. half the time for the fires to weaken the undestroyed steel in the south tower due to that steel having to support roughly twice the amount of weight. for many more answers go to loosechangeexposed channel on you tube.

This book is certainly making the author a lot of money. It appears to be self published and lacking any real evidence or academic integrity. I wonder why this Ph. D. Hasn't written anything else? I wonder why there is no peer reviewed work for this particular theory? The foreword is written by someone with a degree in criminal justice. No one else I the entire field of engineering is willing to agree with this theory? That makes me think twice about the credibility of this book and its author. Seek peer reviewed scholarly work for any real answers.

Wake up! Don't you recognize a Gate Keeper when see one? I worked as a Journeyman Ironworker for 35 years. I have first hand knowledge of what is possible and what is not when it comes to Structural Steel and Dr. Judy Woods' book is nothing more than a Red Herring. For the facts go to Architects and engineers for 911 truth.org. Dr. Woods cannot and doesn't dare debate this organization, she knows she'd lose. End of story, or better yet end of Dr. Woods' Story.

Wood's thesis is unpersuasive scientifically. It has been addressed by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and anyone can learn of the rebuttals at Journal of 9/11 Studies. It is the opinion of many within the movement for 9/11 Truth that Judy Wood is a disinformation specialist working for the government. This is probably correct, although she could just be a bad scientist. In any case, her thesis is without scientific merit, in contrast to that of people like Richard Gage, Steven Jones, and the many others in Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth who assert the Twin Towers were destroyed via explosive demolition.

I now realize her book is a mockery of those 3000 people that died in the 911 HOLOCAUST!! Even though this ZIONAZI has a PHD, you must remember she's never designed or really built anything!!!! You must remember she is purposely mocking the MASS MURDER of HUMAN BEINGS!!!!
The "ADULT PICTURE BOOK" in which a "PHD Engineer" talks PSEUDOSCIENCE, is a work using buffoonery and horseplay along with crude characterization and ludicrously improbable situations.It is obvious disinfo to keep people away from the peer reviewed scientific evidence discovered by Dr.STEVEN JONES and the excellent work of CHRISTOPHER BOLLYN .

She bases her claims on the presence of incinerated cars nearby and handwaving arguments about the seismic signature, the shape of the dust clouds and overhead photos of damaged buildings in the vicinity. The cooked cars can be easily explained by the thermite hypothesis: the radiant energy of tons of molten iron would be contained by the shell of the building until the moment of collapse, at which point it would suddenly engulf the surroundings. In any case, a more direct approach would be to consider the geometry of the situation. The collapses were obviously axially symmetric. The buildings didn't first start crumbling on one side and then another, all sides were involved simultaneously, at least to the resolution of the naked eye. So assuming the beam hypothesis, either the towers were destroyed by multiple beam weapons in surrounding buildings, all triggered at once and somehow kept from destroying objects behind the crumbling towers, or a beam weapon or weapons pretty close to directly overhead.

Assuming the latter, what does this say about the location of a satellite carrying such a weapon? (I'm going to ignore the major problem that the collapses didn't start at the tops of the buildings as would be expected from an overhead beam emanating from a source of small angular size). It would have to stay pretty close to directly overhead for the duration of the collapse, and it would have to pass overhead again when the second tower collapsed. But these two statements are contradictory. An orbital period of 30 minutes (the time between the collapse of the buildings) would require unrealistically low altitudes and high speeds. Even a satellite in a circular orbit of zero miles (e.g. orbiting a neutron star of one earth mass at an altitude of one earth radius) would take 84 minutes to complete and be travelling at nearly 5 miles per second. Obviously such an object would come and go in the blink of an eye and burn up in the atmosphere in no time at all. A geosynchronous satellite can be ruled out because NYC is nowhere near the equator. The only other alternatives would be 2 satellites at high inclined orbits, or a spacecraft which isn't in orbit at all and using something other than inertial propulsion (i.e. antigravity) but at that point why not bring in the easter bunny while you're at it?

The presence of thermite in the WTC dust, videos of molten metal at around 2K centigrade degrees (judging from the color spectrum) flowing from the south tower just before collapse and eyewitnesses to "rivers" of molten metal in the ruins is sufficient evidence of demolition. In terms of falsifying the official explanation, we can already prove the 9/11 investigation was a farce. Judy Wood does nothing but draw ridicule to a very reasonable demand that, at minimum, official lies and propaganda about the "war on terror" be worthy of a high school physics curriculum.

The towers went through the streets in a dust cloud after crumbling. This stuff is such BS I can't stand it. It wasn't like we didn't see it and breath it in. Ms Wood, you wouldn't have written this book if you had been in Manhattan that day. Idiotic.

In her book, Judy Wood attempts to deny all the evidence for explosive controlled demolition of the WTC and replace it with a bizarre and scientifically unproven hypothesis of "Direct Energy Weapons", which she claims were powered by "Free Energy" technology. The compilation of pictures in the book is quite astounding, while it's conclusions and interpretations of scientific evidence are completely skewed and sadly misguided. I would not buy this book, unless you want to study propaganda techniques being used actively to cover-up the crimes of September 11th and protect the WTC Tenant Insiders from ever being investigated for their ties to Insider Trading, Financial Crimes, Nanothermite explosives, and various other evidence which ties them directly to the demolition of the WTC, Future War Crimes, and massive financial gain off the Invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan, and the "War on Terror". This is pure Counter-Intelligence in action!

The very premise that the book and her theory is built upon- that there must be something amiss because the debris pile at ground zero was too small- or that the towers turned to dust- is completely unfounded and baseless. Her "work" if one can call it that, has only one direction to go from there. It seems some people are grasping this because of course the controlled demolition theory is absurd, this gives an even more fantastic delusion for one to indulge in rather than face reality. Our policies containing Saddam Hussein killed over one million Iraqi Arab Muslims in the 90's, yet people think it's absurd that might anger militant Muslims and they would strike back. It really is that simple, and in all of Dr. Judy Wood's studies in obtaining her degrees she seems to have never come across Occam's Razor.

Woman is an absolute loon. She provides 0 evidence, just speculation. Her book is just a ploy to make money off of American deaths. Watch her videos on YouTube before even considering buying this nonsensical fantasy book.

Dr. Judy Wood Confession video She was Managed The Cover up Business

"It was pretty easy to manage the people who do see it or are able to see it. Like I've been managed. What I mean by managed is the cover-up business."

Assuming the worst from this admission, then, yeah, it does make sense.

Source
Dr. Judy Wood - 9/11: 14 Years Later & The Media Cover-Up Continues - September 11, 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji24VJaFIfo

watch?v=-lpwsWjShPU

Dr. Woods seems to ignore considerable evidence of explosions in favor so some whacko theory about space based weapons, HAARP etc. All you need to know about Dr. Judy Woods can be found in a very brief but revealing interview. Go to google video and search for "Dr. Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood"

The oft-repeated mantra, dripping with a quasi-religeous messianic fervor, replete with superlatives & exclamation marks, & referring to author Judy Wood as a martyr with a heart as big as all outdoors who has nobly sacrificed all (even lost her job) for Truth is: "You gotta read this book!!"

All you have to do to cast doubt on this overblown hype is read the rebuttal/demolishing of Wood's very short section on thermite by the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (hereinafter 'A&E'). Basically, Wood DENIES BUT DOES NOT REBUT OR REFUTE A&E's well-documented/sourced information on thermate/thermite/thermitic material(hereinafter 'thermite'). A&E present a solid chunk of documented information supporting the finding of evidence of thermite in the rubble of the buildings & also present their careful discussion of thermite - including its properties & uses, what traces/evidence of it were found in the rubble, the high temperatures it reaches & which can remain for long periods of time, the fact that it can be used to cut through steel columns & can also be used as an explosive, & the fact that bomb-sniffing dogs do not detect it.

This is important because the presence of thermite, and the high temperatures it causes, are INCOMPATIBLE with Wood's DEW [Directed Energy Weapons] theory, according to which there would/should be no such high temperatures in the rubble. So you would think that she would be eager & champing at the bit to refute this thermite-in-the-rubble information. But oddly enough, Judy Wood's VERY short discussion of thermite in her book does not even mention/address most of these points - and on some of them that she does address, she is mistaken/incorrect. Her discussion of thermite is very short - so short that she has to pad. (See discussion of this point below.)

I repeat: Wood simply does not respond at all to several of the topics/main points covered by A&E. She just ignores them. Now, in a debate, if one party ignores/fails to respond to important elements of her opponent's argument - well - she loses the debate. Right?

Helllooo, Wood devotees - is brain engaged, or are we merely emoting?

So: Judy Wood simply side-steps many of A&e's points/evidence, or DENIES them without offering any evidence in support of that denial; & she pads her book's short section on thermite with non-relevant & off-point ramblings. At this point, I already have all I need to know about Wood's sincerity, honesty, & reliability/ trustworthiness - & lack thereof. We see her in her own book being deliberately deceptive & evasive, & simply failing or refusing to discuss several important findings/points raised by A&E.

So why not just 'read the book' as the Woodites urge, always with plentiful exclamation marks?

Answer: because in today's world of information overload & increasing specialization of knowledge, most non-scientist/non-specialist readers, quite simply DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH SCIENCE IN THEIR HEADS TO BE ABLE INTELLIGENTLY TO EVALUATE A BOOK ON A HIGHLY TECHNICAL SUBJECT SUCH AS THIS ONE. The general reader, even if intelligent & college-educated, who is not an expert/conversant in the scientific fields relevant to the book's subject, is not really qualified to judge the accuracy of the information; thus when reading technical books, they essentially TRUST the author to be sincerely seeking & presenting the truth. So it makes sense to check it out, to exercise 'due diligence' by, for instance, reading reviews of the author's book/s, preferably reviews by others who have expertise in the subject-matter of the book in question.

In the present instance, certainly, just 'reading the book' obviously was not enough, with so many 'true believers' writing encomiums for a book & an author who is demonstrably dishonest on the pages of that book, with errors both of omission and commission.

Additionally, when it comes to books on subjects both highly technical & highly controversial, & also dealing with such subjects as possible secret government false flag ops that are definitely not 'in the public interest', I suggest another 'caveat lector': We are talking here about a subject that could be (in fact, almost certainly is) fraught with disinformation agents, theories, & publications. When the book in question is a huge tome purporting to be the ONLY ONE telling the truth on a controversial & highly technical subject, a book suspected by many 9/11 Truth activists of being a piece of disinformation, it is all the more important to check out how trustworthy/ honest the author is before trustingly exposing oneself to & relying upon said author's (alleged) information & guidance.

MY POINT - JUST 'READING THE BOOK' IS NOT ENOUGH. ONE MUST ALSO CONSIDER/EVALUATE THE CHARACTER, TRUSTWORTHINESS, & MOTIVES OF THE AUTHOR. Authors can be ignorant, loose cannons, spin-meisters. This might seem obvious, but in fact readers - people in general - in part, I suspect, out of laziness - tend to be surprisingly gullible & trusting of 'experts'.

It has been a good thing that a friend (a Wood 'true believer' actually) caused me to examine Wood's book more closely. From the get-go I had 'bad feelings' about Wood. She seemed to fit pretty well the characteristic profile of the spoiler/dis-info operative/tool - a Johnny-come-lately to the field, with eccentric 'new information/analysis' that attacks other, usually prevailing, dissident information sources, & divides & conquers the dissident movement, turning it into an undignified 'he said/she said' squabble which most people find distasteful & will throw up their hands & walk away from, muttering, 'Who knows; it's beyond me to figure it out' ... and the neutralization/marginalization of the dissident movement/information is thus achieved.

Wood also comes across to me as evasive & flippant in her interviews, & as relying too heavily - ad nauseum might be the better phrase - on a single & oft repeated word - 'dustification.' And much of her audio interview time seemed actually spent talking AROUND the issue rather than delving into the hard scientific proof, if any, of her theory - as opposed to speculation & indirect, suppositious evidence. For instance, in the famous Jenkins interview, she repeatedly declines to discuss scientific matters he presents or asks her about; she jumps around & interrupts frequently; & she asks a lot of questions (the point or purpose of which remains vague) about things like what happens when you put this, that, or the other in a microwave oven.

In contrast, speakers/writers for A&E stay focused on scientific evidence, which they are eager & prepared to present. And they don't 'explain' by asking a lot of vague, open-ended questions. Instead they provide hard data in support of their theory. THIS BEHAVIOR IS INDICATIVE OF HAVING A WELL-SUPPORTED THEORY & BEING EAGER TO USE THE AVAILABLE TIME TO PRESENT SAID SUPPORTING INFORMATION/DATA.

My point is that A&E pass my 'truth, integrity, & honesty' test & Wood fails it. They present their information in an organized fashion, stay on point, & back up their points with documented factual data. Wood never seems to get to the point, rather merely makes assertions, rhetorically asks/repeats vague 'leading questions' which she does not answer, interrupts & jumps around a lot, uses the word 'dustification' repeatedly & in lieu of deeper discussion, uses a 'cute', whimsical invented, idiosyncratic vocabulary, & in general tends to control the interview & create an atmosphere of confusion, tension, & uncertainty. And she never seems to get to the point of presenting hard data in support of her theory.

IS Wood a dis-info operative, unleashed upon the 9/11 Truth movement to divide & conquer it as per the long established formula? There are few who have the necessary inside information to answer that question with certainty.

However, judging simply by results, Wood IS indeed a spoiler, IN EFFECT IF NOT ALSO IN INTENT, because indeed she has divided the 9/11 Truth movement into warring factions & has shifted its focus away from public education & pressing for a new investigation of what really happened to bring down the towers, to endless vituperative squabbling & personal attacks, most of the latter actually emanating from the Wood camp.

The Woodite will (and invariably does) say, producing their trump card ... but she has written a book, a whole great big book on the subject. And just look at all those beautiful pictures.

Well, there are books and there are books. As mentioned, I tend NOT to read purportedly scientific books by authors who have given me reason to distrust their character, sincerity, accuracy, truthfulness, & motivation in writing their book.

However, a friend sent me Wood's book, which I said I would read, not realizing how huge & chaotic it is. At first I was impressed, by its sheer size & by all those photographs. Gee, I thought, maybe I HAVE been wrong about Wood. And I attributed the lack of organization to its being self-published & an amateur production. But then I thought again & realized that as a Ph.D. scientist, Wood HAS to know better than that about the necessity & importance of organizing her presentation of material & making it more accessible & 'reader-friendly.' Looking the book over, it seemed to me that the material was pretty much hodge-podged (suggesting that the book was hastily put together). I searched in vain for some organization & guides to help me enter, explore, & get an overview of the main points & evidence underlying/contained within this huge outpouring of words.

I looked for introductory & closing summaries at the front & back of chapters, and of the book as a whole, such as are SOP in scientific publications, & for material relating the content to previous & up-coming information - and I didn't find them. I would argue that such guiding aids/elements are necessary, in a book of this size & purported scope, and also that logically, the sincere author, aware of the difficulty of her subject matter & the novelty of her theory, would be EAGER to provide such aids to the comprehension of her arcane theory.

Not only is the book lacking in organization to help the reader grasp & understand her information as it relates to & supports her theory; additionally, it relies on an eccentric & idiosyncratic vocabulary. Some Woodites seem to see this as a plus, a sign of her originality. I tend to see it as further removing the book from the sphere of normal & established scientific discourse, & hence as more obfuscation posing as originality & information so new that it needs new words to describe/discuss it. Frankly, no new vocabulary is needed. Science already has words for everything that happened on, & that we observe from the footage of, 9/11.

Wood possibly wants to create the impression that her thinking is so new & original that it needs an entire new scientific lexicon to do it justice - which is simply not the case. All the new words come across to me as just a bit too cutesy; & also Wood's ego seems to be showing. It reminds me of an attention-seeking adolescent straining to dazzle with her genius & originality.

Re the huge amount of info in Wood's book - well, is it reliable info, or is it a mix of good info & dis-info - and padding? The volume of info in & of itself proves nothing. As previously mentioned, the non-specialist actually is not in a position to evaluate much of this information. And if brevity is the soul of wit, it is also the soul of good writing. In fact, a whole bleepload of purported information can itself be a smokescreen - and can cause people to conclude, Wow, anyone with so much to say, & it all looks so technical, etc., MUST be right - and really smart. The lack of organization also tends to leave the reader floundering in a sea of words the accuracy, honesty, & truth of which the lay reader will as previously mentioned often ultimately have to accept on faith.

In closing, I suggest that Woodites read the A&E discussion of her treatment of the thermite issue in the link provided below, & then read Wood's treatment of the thermite question/debate in her book.

Here is a short summary of the A&E rebuttal of Wood's position/section on thermite. The A&E material is not that long, IS well organized & documented, & I strongly recommend reading & comparing/contrasting it with Wood's woefully spotty, lame, & incomplete response to their thermite informaton.

[NOTE: In my comment below this review, find the link to the complete A&E rebuttal, which did not copy here.]

The A&E rebuttal discusses with supporting references -

1."Previously molten iron microspheres found in the dust"
Basically here A&E present documented data (from independent sources) conclusively indicating the presence of thermitic residue/effects, & resulting very high (& long-lasting) temperatures well beyond what could have been produced from office fires.
A&E state that "The DEW hypothesis does not address this [data] and cannot account for it - because it [Wood's DEW theory] is inconsistent with the extreme heat required to produce it."

2."A video, photos, and dozens of witnesses [which]document molten metal"

A&E state that "The DEW hypothesis does not explain this phenomenon [molten metal]. In fact Wood denies that these temperatures were ever reached, without even addressing this evidence, which is documented by official and unofficial sources."

3."Active unignited nanothermite found in the dust"

A&E state: "An international research team found nano-engineered thermite, or "nanothermite," in each of the four samples of dust examined as part of a peer-reviewed study. One key advantage of such substances for the purposes of a surreptitious controlled demolition would be that it would not be detected by conventional chemical tests nor by trained bomb-sniffing dogs;" A&E also state that "The red/gray nanothermite chips constitute direct evidence that supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis. The DEW hypothesis does not explain how or why this engineered energetic material was found throughout the dust. DEW proponents merely wave away the evidence." ...

4."Persistent Extreme Heat"

Extremely high temperatures at Ground Zero are documented by various sources, for example in thermal images by MIT & NASA, USGS aerial photo 9-16-01, by photographs, and by numerous witness accounts. The American Society of Safety Engineers reported that "the debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF. Wood denies that these temperatures were reached, without addressing the ample evidence for them."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No longer quoting the A&E article -

Now, turning to Wood's discussion of thermite....

In the short section of her book discussing thermite, she asks, what is thermitic material, making no reference to A&E's very good explanation of what it is. (This leaves us with the impression that A&E didn't bother to explain what it is.)

Instead of engaging with the actual subject, thermite/thermate found in the rubble etc., she has a long paragraph trying to debunk the phrase 'peer-reviewed' which was used by A&E in their thermite discussion. She mentions a wholly unrelated article run in the Boston Globe that was alleged to be peer-reviewed but was found to be a hoax. This study has nothing to do with A&E 9/11 info except that both used the phrase and concept of 'peer review' ... so her reason for taking space to include it seems to be: 'Hey, Joe Blow here did a totally fraudulent study & claimed some of the info in it was peer reviewed. YOU claim some of your info is peer reviewed. Therefore your study too 'could be' fraudulent.'

Need I point out that that is weak, as a rebuttal of information/evidence. It is also a kind of padding to disguise the fact that Wood actually has very little to say about thermite as it relates to the twin towers. She denies the A&E allegations - which are well documented - but does NOT REBUT OR REFUTE THEM. As mentioned above, this is losing behavior in a debate. Her treatment of this extremely important subject is blatantly dishonest. And the fact that she resorts to this extraneous discussion of 'peer review' shows how WEAK, insubstantial and in fact TOTALLY LACKING her case against the thermite data acually is.

She also includes some additional info about thermite that is not relevant to the matter under discussion. (More padding - makes me wonder how much of the rest of her 'big book' is padding).

In another paragraph of her very short thermite section, she asks, "Where is the proof that thermite has ever been used to completely pulverize buildings in controlled demolition (not simply cleaning up debris)? The mechanisms of cutting and pulverization are mutually exclusive, and thermite cuts and melts but is not explosive." Here again she is either unfamiliar with the A&E information or deliberately pretending to be - A&E do not say that the thermite was used to 'pulverize' buildings. The thermite was used to cut thru the steel support columns, according to the A&E research. However A&E do quote other sources which say that thermite can be used as an explosive.

As the A&E article mentions, Wood's material never attempts to explain how orbiting energetic weapons could ever have made the multiple clean cuts that were found in the steel support columns.

She mentions the use of bomb sniffing dogs in the rubble of the towers, as a proof of her no-bombs theory & a dis-proof of the A&E information; but does not mention that bomb-sniffing dogs do not detect thermite.

Even her Occam's Razor discussion is twisted. She mentions but subtly distorts it. The main use of Occam's Razor is to argue against the positing of unknown causes/unnecessarily complex causes, esp. when known causes and/or fewer/simpler causes could account for the observed phenomena. Occam's Razor works against her, not for her.

Quoting the A&E rebuttal of Wood's theory:

"Why posit sophisticated secret technology to explain these observations, when some combination of thermitic incendiaries and explosives placed throughout the buildings can explain them much more simply, without making wild assumptions? This is a clear violation of Occam's Razor, which says that the simplest explanation that accounts for all the facts [and one that posits the fewest vague causal 'unknowns'] should be given the greatest credibility."

And as for 'all of that dust' - A&E agree that a whole lot of cement was reduced to dust ('dustified', if you will). There would be a lot of dust for sure - cement dust. Never has controlled demo been used to bring down two such tall buildings standing close to one another. The amount of 'dustification' would be unprecedented. This large amount of dust can be accounted for by the A&E theory & does not necessarily argue that novel/exotic methods were/must have been employed to destroy the buildings, or that steel beams were 'dustified'.

Concerning the alleged absence of sufficient material at the base of the buildings (sufficient to be compatible with the controlled demo theory) - A&E point out that most buildings contain a lot of 'empty space,' & also mention that it is known that material was flung quite far away from the buildings & that the buildings DID NOT fall in their own footprints.

This is, of course, not intended to be an exhaustive comparison or critique. My point is that just comparing/contrasting A&E and Wood on the subject of thermite alone is sufficient to establish that Wood is not honest, that she lies by omission & commission, & that as an information source/provider of theories/explanations she is not reliable or trust-worthy. A&E in contrast document & support their theory professionally & exhaustively. They come across as evidencing the integrity & truthfulness - science is about getting at the truth, is it not? - that is glaringly lacking both in Wood's book & in her conduct in interviews.

Despite the fact that there are widely known images of WTC building 2 falling into and severely damaging WTC building 3 on 9/11, Woods claims that the damage to WTC building 3 is the result of an exotic "space weapon". Woods even publicly claims with virtually no supporting evidence that the OKC federal building was destroyed by these same "space weapons"!

People serious about studying the apparent demolitions of the WTC buildings on 9/11 would do better to refer to reviewed studies like "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" or evaluate the abundant evidence of the apparent demolition of the WTC buildings at the website of "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth".